Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 13, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that these devices look similar to what was discussed for 1 <br />Spring Lake Road a few years ago. He then said that there was a resident at the time claiming 2 <br />that they were very bad. He further commented that this seems to be unfair to force the City to 3 <br />pay for a costly experiment. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Gunn asked what happens if this experiment fails and who has to fix the 6 <br />damage and remove them. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated the City takes on the risk for installing it and there is no 9 <br />recourse to the watershed district. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Linke suggested a motion to notify Rice Creek Watershed District that the City deems this 12 <br />to be experimental and that, if their experiment fails and causes the City of Mounds View to 13 <br />expend dollars to repair this, the City expects them to pay for the bill. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated he had attended a meeting with Steve 16 <br />Hobbs and Mr. Hobbs had expressed a willingness to come to a Council meeting. He then said it 17 <br />may be a good idea to invite him to discuss the concerns the City has. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Mike Maroni of 5045 Brighton Lane asked if this is the same Watershed District that put a pond 20 <br />right next to the parking lot at an elementary school so the kids could walk through it and 21 <br />potentially fall through the ice in winter. He then said it boggles his mind that these people can 22 <br />dictate how the City spends its money. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that by approving this resolution the City is saying it will pay 25 <br />for this project using City MSA funds. He then asked if it would make more sense to wait until 26 <br />after the City discusses the matter with the Watershed representative. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mayor Linke indicated the contractor has already done the work and he is asking to get paid for it 29 <br />so he does not feel it would be right to withhold payment to him for work done and authorized by 30 <br />the City. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Quick indicated he would rather postpone payment so that the City’s options 33 <br />are not limited. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mayor Linke commented that this should have been done first but the City already authorized the 36 <br />work. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Quick commented that the City did not know Rice Creek was going to pull the 39 <br />funding. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Public Works Director Lee recommended that the Council go ahead with the rest of the items so 42 <br />as not to delay the project any farther. 43 <br /> 44