Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 13, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br />P. Consideration of Resolution 6111, a Resolution Approving Change Order 1 <br />Number 3 for the County Road H2 Street Improvement Project – Installation 2 <br />of Infiltration Systems and Pathway Segments along County Highway 10. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Linke asked if it was possible to bill Rice Creek Watershed for this experimental process 5 <br />they required. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the City does have a grant application into the 8 <br />Watershed District for $40,000 for a partial reimbursement of the costs but the matter has been 9 <br />tabled until the project is 100% completed. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Linke indicated he did not approve of the way Rice Creek Watershed District is using the 12 <br />City as a guinea pig and charging for the experiment. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated the City had the option to prevent any observations on these 15 <br />devices and not allow access to them and then they would be of no value to the watershed 16 <br />district. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned whether there is some way that Rice Creek and the City 19 <br />could work out a better agreement or if it would be a waste of time. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Staff had tried once and it did not work. He then 22 <br />explained that the original cost participation was 75% but that was denied and the amount was 23 <br />reduced. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Linke asked what the basis for this experimental retention area was. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated it is a combination of wanting to see what happens and a 28 <br />need in the area. He then said they looked at where it was possible to do infiltration basins to 29 <br />look at treating as much water on H2 as possible. There was no room on the north side because 30 <br />of the pathway and one way was to do infiltration devices under the pathway. He further 31 <br />commented that these are treating 0.59 acres of water at a cost of close to $100,000 so there is a 32 <br />question of cost benefit and it is an experimental device. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Mayor Linke commented that the City has to spend $60,000 because they said so. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated the City may also incur additional risk and costs should the 37 <br />devices fail. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Quick asked where the devices would be buried. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that both are installed and here is one located to the east of 42 <br />Scotland Green Court and the second is east of Silver Lake Road between Silver Lake Road and 43 <br />Park View Drive. 44 <br /> 45