My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:13 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/24/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that both parties have reviewed the RFP 2 <br />with the changes and signed the agreement. He then reviewed the changes to the RFP agreement. 3 <br /> 4 <br />City Administrator Ulrich pointed out that the item at the bottom of the Staff report should be 5 <br />added as it was not included with the original agreement that was sent out. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Marty asked if both parties are aware of the paragraph. 8 <br /> 9 <br />City Administrator Ulrich read the paragraph clarifying the language on future scheduled dates. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mr. Hall indicated he understands and agrees. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Waste said he understands but thought one of the concerns was that the manager kept 14 <br />booking and it was important to keep booking. He then said he can agree but most important 15 <br />was to continue booking and not turn business away. He further commented that he has no 16 <br />problem continuing booking and agreeing. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the language should be modified to book through the City. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated this matter has been discussed at length 21 <br />with the City Attorney and, for simplicity sake, the City Attorney prefers the language proposed. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if all deposits will go to the manager. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated the discussion with the City Attorney 26 <br />regarding deposits was lengthy but the consensus was that the City is in a landlord relationship 27 <br />and how the deposits is the tenants responsibility. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Stigney commented that deposits brought in over the 60-day period could 30 <br />disappear and leave the City with the responsibility of continuing the booking without the 31 <br />deposit. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the caterers want good 34 <br />relationships with their clients and they will find ways of satisfying the needs. He then said that 35 <br />he feels comfortable the matter would be addressed by the caterers. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Stigney asked how much rental the City would be getting from Community Ed. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Community Ed was paying $11.00 40 <br />per square foot but the current market dictates from $6.00 to $8.00 per square foot. He then said 41 <br />that additional breakout rooms will mean the City will see a fair number of corporate and non-42 <br />profits using the center. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.