Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that the City gets the same money regardless of whether they 1 <br />use breakout rooms and he has an issue with tying in the Community Ed space to the banquet 2 <br />center to allow the manager to get the money. He then asked what the buyout figure is. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated the amount is $28,500 and after the 5 <br />$10,000 payment the City payout would be $18,500. He then indicated that from the standpoint 6 <br />of having monthly payment the City is assured of covering overhead costs and that is his goal and 7 <br />the $6,000 from either party covers overhead for both areas. He further commented that 8 <br />continuing along the same path the City would certainly have substantial losses on the 9 <br />Community Ed area. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he would have liked to see the City go for an RFP with or 12 <br />without the Community Ed space to see how much could be garnered using both spaces 13 <br />separately. He then said he has an issue with the buyout being $28,500 when the first offer was 14 <br />to payoff at $10,000. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mayor Linke indicated the original settlement offer was no longer an option. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he has an issue with the $10,000 contribution to do business 19 <br />in the City and several questions with the RFP so he will not support this regardless of which 20 <br />business Council chooses. He then said he does not think the City should wait until June to go 21 <br />out for an RFP and he would prefer to look at the banquet center and the Community Ed space 22 <br />and get all the options before paying $28,500. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Gunn indicated that both proposals looked good but she feels The Mermaid is 25 <br />the one she feels confident can move in and get up to speed right away. 26 <br /> 27 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Marty. To Approve the Banquet Center Interim Agreement With 28 <br />The Mermaid. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Gunn indicated she picked The Mermaid mostly because of the staff, the 31 <br />amount of staff that they have and the years of experience that they have. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Marty agreed and said that the one thing that caught his eye was the marketing 34 <br />ability of The Mermaid and noted that they have spent $129,000 this year on marketing. He then 35 <br />said that in the proposal The Mermaid has marketing planned for each month. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Marty indicated that The Mermaid staff is assembled and ready to go and the 38 <br />Roberts team would come on board to form an organization for this project. He then said that 39 <br />both proposals were very good but the edge went to The Mermaid for him. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mr. Waste indicated they would like to have the chance to do the ramp up and this is 14 months 42 <br />worth of work. He then said that, as for staffing, no one carries that many people on the payroll 43 <br />and would have to hire. 44 <br /> 45