My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/04/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/04/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:18 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:54:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/7/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/7/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 12 <br />Meeting Date: April 7, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Worksession <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss the Proposed Sick Leave Policy. <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />This item is on your agenda at the request of the Council. The proposed policy was <br />reviewed and discussed at the Council’s last worksession and further discussion was <br />determined necessary. The Council had requested comments from the League of MN <br />Cities, our Finance Department and the City’s labor consultant, Labor Relations Associates. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Labor Relations stated their position initially at the first meeting this item had been <br />introduced. They indicate that such a policy should be negotiated under the terms of the <br />City’s labor agreements. The Finance department indicated that such a policy, if one were <br />enacted, would result in extra staff time and system manipulation to manage; yet this would <br />not be an overwhelming task, especially in light of how infrequently the policy would be <br />utilized by employees. Last, LMC responded with some concerns of their own, which are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />“While we understand and respect the city’s desire to help employees in these difficult <br />situations, following are some serious issues that the city should address before <br />adopting such a policy – some of these considerations could be addressed with a <br />very specific and restrictive policy, others may be more difficult: <br /> <br />1. Employees who abuse sick leave are left with little incentive to save their sick <br />leave for a “rainy day” if they have a sick leave donation policy to fall back on. <br /> <br />2. The city would need to address some serious data privacy issues in order to <br />administer such a policy – i.e., medical data on employees is private data. At <br />minimum, the city would have to require the employee to sign a release prior to <br />soliciting donations on behalf of the employee. Also, any medical data needs <br />to be protected under state privacy laws (and possibly federal privacy laws-- <br />the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act may be applicable, but it’s <br />difficult to determine as the regulations have not really been tested yet.) <br />Although it is tempting to have the employee solicit donations him/herself in <br />order to avoid these privacy issues, the city should probably not handle <br />solicitations in this manner. It could cause co-workers to feel coerced to <br />donate and in the case of a supervisor soliciting donations from a subordinate, <br />the coercion would potentially be even more problematic for the city.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.