My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:25 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:32:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/11/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 26 <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he had made a request for City expenses and credit card bills <br />for department heads because he feels there may be some infractions and he feels it should be <br />reviewed by Council rather than paying an auditor to review it. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated it was his understanding that cities need to have a policy on <br />credit cards and, if there is no written ordinance on regulation of credit cards, the City may be out <br />of compliance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs handed out a letter addressing the charter violation issue. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs asked for clarification on the data practices question. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty explained that he had requested the expense reports and credit card bills <br />for the department heads and Council Members because when MMKR did an audit they found <br />some possible infractions and he thought, without going to the expense of having auditors go <br />through it, the City could just look at it to see if there is a need for auditors. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that Council could investigate the matter as a whole. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he had requested the information and was billed for it. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the request was treated as a data practices request because <br />the request came as part of a request from Mrs. Marty and from Council Member Marty. The <br />request of Mrs. Marty was fulfilled and the other request was treated as one data practices request <br />because Council Member Marty and Mrs. Marty had requested the exact same information. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller explained that she had contacted the City Attorney’s office and the <br />League of Minnesota Cities for guidance on data practices requests because the City has been <br />receiving numerous requests and, upon notification of the costs involved, people have been <br />asking to review the information after copies are made and Staff time is expended preparing the <br />request. She then commented that she had been advised that it would be appropriate to charge <br />for data practices requests. She also noted that she had been told that a Council Member could <br />not be treated any differently than any other resident in the community asking for a data practices <br />request. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that the request made took 13 hours of the bookkeepers time <br />and was 400 plus pages of copying. She then indicated if Council Member Marty would like to <br />know in the future, the estimated costs to fulfill his requests she would be happy to provide an <br />estimate. She further commented that the request was a sizeable request and did not come from <br />Council as a whole. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty confirmed that the City Administrator would not let him see the <br />information until he paid the $452.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.