My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:35 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/25/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes – 4 Nays- 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />I. Resolution 5698 Scheduling a Second Work Session in February. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty inquired as to why he was not informed of the potential of a second work <br />session in February prior to receiving the information in his packet. He then indicated that he has <br />to bid his work schedule for the coming month by the 18th of the month. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller noted the possibility of scheduling a second work session in February <br />was discussed at the work session on January 22, 2002 because there are already 15 items on the <br />work session agenda for February. She then commented that Staff feels it would be more <br />appropriate to have two work sessions rather than one marathon meeting and, because the off <br />Monday falls on a holiday, the work session was scheduled for Tuesday. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney commented that it would be nice if all Council Members could be at <br />the meeting and asked if the date could be changed to accommodate schedules. <br /> <br />It was the consent of Council to consult calendars to determine if Thursday, February 21, 2002 <br />would work for all Council Members. <br /> <br />Council member Marty noted that Council Member Quick had asked at the work session that <br />Staff contact him to determine his availability for the second work session. He then noted he had <br />yet to be contacted by Staff to discuss his availability. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that Council Member Marty was not contacted because the <br />matter was placed on Council’s agenda for consideration. She then commented that the meeting <br />would have been scheduled for the off Monday if it had not been a holiday. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre suggested changing the Resolution to indicate that, pending the approval of <br />Council Member Marty’s and Council Member Quick’s schedules the second work session <br />would be scheduled for February 21, 2002. He then suggested that, if the 21st does not work for <br />the Council Members then the meeting would be held as previously scheduled on February 19, <br />2002. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve Item 6I, Resolution 5698 as Amended. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />K. Resolution 5694, Amending the 2002 Fee Schedule. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that it was brought to his attention that the <br />fee schedule did not accurately reflect the park dedication fees and, since that change needed to <br />be made, the fee to move buildings was adjusted as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.