My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:04 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:55:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she would research the matter and provide further <br />information. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked Staff to research the answers to his questions on Check 107735, <br />107736, 107749 and report back to Council. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item C as Presented. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he wanted to thank Mr. Keckeisen publicly for his service to <br />the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney read Resolution 5721. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item E as Presented. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he was wondering if the payment was calculated on the net <br />and, if not, said he thinks it should be changed to reflect that. He then asked for the status of the <br />RFP for management of the banquet center. He further commented that it appears the payment is <br />calculated based on the 78.88% of gross revenues calculation that has been found not to be in the <br />best interest of the City. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the City is still operating under the current management <br />contract because the City has not severed its relationship with Innovative Images. She further <br />explained that because the relationship has not been severed with Innovative Images, the City is <br />not in a position to renegotiate the contract. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney pointed out the last paragraph says net revenues but paragraph five says <br />gross revenues. <br /> <br />Mary _Tatarack indicated she had worked with the table but not the Resolution and explained <br />how the calculation was arrived at. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she believed the term gross should be net based on Exhibit A <br />because the number in the Resolution is referred to in the chart as a net number. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he would like to table this matter for further clarification in <br />order to avoid issues with miscalculations as in the past. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Table Consent Agenda Item E For Further Information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.