Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty pointed out a typo in Resolution 5722 in the third whereas. He then <br />asked if the position had been posted and, if so, when it closes and the timeframe for hiring. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the position was posted, Staff has reviewed applications, and <br />interviewed for the position last Friday. She then indicated Staff would be before Council with a <br />recommendation for hiring at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether the temp works a 40 hour week. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the temp is scheduled to work a 40 hour week. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he had an issue with the temp being paid for a 40 hour week <br />because he questions whether the City gets 40 hours worth of work out of the temp. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre commented that the person being replaced by the temp was a full-time employee. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated the individual has been working just under 40 hours <br />per week and said she asked for a four week extension because she was not sure how interviews <br />would turn out on Friday. She then said if Council approves the recommendation for hiring and <br />the individual accepts the position, she would not need the full four-week extension for the temp. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item G as Presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Items B, D, and F as <br />Presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />9. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Public Hearing, First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 693, an <br />Ordinance Amending Section 1106.03 of the Mounds View Zoning Code <br />Pertaining to Accessory Structures. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre opened the public hearing at 9:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated the amendment to the Ordinance is being proposed by the Planning <br />Commission because it was discovered that the combined area for accessory structures was not <br />great enough for larger properties in the City. He further explained that the Code currently <br />allows 1400 square feet of accessory structures and the Planning Commission is recommending a <br />change to allow 1800 square feet.