Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked whether the City has received any funds to reimburse the city for <br />time spent to develop the data practice requests of Council Member Marty. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that the way that the policy works is that once the data <br />practices request is compiled a letter is sent out to the requestor and the individual is not <br />responsible for that dollar figure until the materials are picked up. She then said no. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that Council Member Marty is in the same boat as any other <br />citizen who makes a data privacy request and does not follow through with it and now Council <br />Member Stigney is interested in that information. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that Council Member Stigney’s request is a new request and <br />it is a request to view the information and that is different than asking for copies. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that the City spent the Staff time to compile the information. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated this is a separate data practices request. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated the City Administrator was correct and said it is unfortunate but <br />the way the statute is written the City can only charge for Staff time if copies are made. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked whether someone could come in and make a request and say they <br />do not want the information and then another person can come in and ask to look at it. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that the requested data becomes personal to the one making the <br />request and the City has to produce that data again as a separate data request. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she would not be making copies as Council Member Stigney <br />had asked to view the originals. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick said he feels it is a scam situation and he feels it is rotten that the City <br />can be abused the way it has been because there have been numerous requests that are compiled <br />and left sitting at City Hall. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she had asked the Finance Director to provide her with a <br />memo discussing his concerns with the data practices requests and the undue burden placed on <br />his department. She further commented that in the Finance Director’s opinion a great deal of <br />time and effort has been spent compiling these data requests and, as a result, some of what he <br />needs to do has fallen through the cracks and the City may need to incur costs to have the <br />auditor’s office take care of some of those tasks to ready the City for the audit. She indicated that <br />it could cost between $650.00 and $1,000 for the auditor’s office to help catch up on those tasks. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick indicated the costs multiply and cost the City money and he questions <br />whether the intentions are in the best interest of the City. <br />