My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:04 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:55:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney said he feels if it is public information, the public should have the right <br />to view it at no cost and that is what he requested. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick said he agreed with Council Member Stigney and said he will look at the <br />information at some point as well. He then commented that willy nilly requests are a waste of <br />money. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre asked whether Council Member Marty would have the right to ask to see what <br />Council Member Stigney requested without paying for it. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs suggested asking for an opinion from the Department of Administration on <br />that issue because he is not sure that the system in place would allow someone to not pay for one <br />request and make a different request in order to avoid paying. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that by statute a person can only make a request for the same data once <br />every six months. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she did not mean to imply that anyone has been asking for <br />information unduly but, in conjunction with all the other requests in the last year, the requests <br />have been tremendous and a lot of work for Staff. She then commented that Council may get an <br />appreciation for Staff time after reviewing those requests. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney said he did not think his request was willy nilly. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated there is some language in current statute that indicates that the keeper <br />of the City’s data can use his or her best judgment as to fill the requests in a manner that does not <br />impede the business of the City but that has not been held up by the oversight body. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked if the City could publish the names of the individuals who have <br />made data privacy requests and the amount of time or costs involved with producing those <br />requests and whether or not the bill to the City was paid. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that any request is public and any staff time put into the request is <br />public. He further indicated that the requests are not unlike any other city function if someone is <br />making a request that is data of the City and becomes subject to someone looking at it. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick suggested listing in Mounds View Matters who is making requests and <br />how much it costs the City. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated that the employee who is on Medicare would be <br />able to move to the City’s plan for her primary insurance because the federal government likes to <br />get rid of the financial burden. She then indicated the individual could come onto the group plan <br />at any time and would qualify for contribution for part time employees which is $225.00. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller asked Ms. Reed to share the information on supplemental insurance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.