My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/12/30
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/12/30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/15/2018 1:38:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/30/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/30/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 9, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that part of the issue with the policy is that <br />up to this point Staff has been documenting hours on a daily basis so, if you work 7 hours one <br />day then you use 1 hour flex time and, according to the policy, this is based on a 40 hour work <br />week. He then said it becomes confusing if Staff works two 12 hour days and asks for Thursday <br />off and Friday if on Wednesday you leave early that should not count against you if you already <br />worked a 40 hour work week. Those four hours should not be flex they are just hours he did not <br />work. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that when you go back and look at time sheets you may see situations <br />where in this pay period someone documents more than 16 hours of flex time but it does not <br />show that someone worked 55 hours when maybe 4 hours of flex time should not have been <br />documented they just did not work. He then said that since it is based on a forty-hour week, Staff <br />should not be documenting it on an 8 hour day as it leads to issue with net. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas said that is what is allowed for flex time. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she is responsible for time sheets and partly because there <br />was a lot of use of flex time that she did not understand and questioned a great deal so she <br />instituted a daily time sheet so, when questioned, Staff could show hours. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he did not believe there was ever any intent to be in violation of the <br />policy and he does not feel that Staff does but, by documenting on an 8 hour day it causes net <br />issues but the documenting was an attempt to provide more accountability for time. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas asked for clarification. <br /> <br />Finance Director Hansen commented that the other issue is if Staff records time on an 8 hour day <br />rather than a 40 hour week is Staff hourly rather than salaried. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that is one of the factors used to determine whether an employee is <br />hourly or salaried. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that everything Staff is doing is acceptable and said the <br />amendment does nothing but says that Staff is doing it according to the policy. Flex time is not <br />an issue until you get to a 40 hour work week. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Quick) Motion carried. <br /> <br />J. Resolution 5902 Approving Severance for Givonna Reed <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney requested that the Finance Department verify that flex time used has <br />been in accordance with the personnel policy and that the severance payment be adjusted <br />accordingly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.