Laserfiche WebLink
The basic 3-C (continuing, comprehensive and coordinated) comprehensive <br />planning approach was used to examine demographic and land use issues along <br />the TH 10 corridor. One-on-one meetings with each community were held to <br />obtain a variety of land use, zoning, and population data. This data was then <br />reviewed and summarized by growth segment and sub-area along the corridor. <br />The information suggests significant population increases (on the order of 60 to <br />over 400 percent) and a strong growth trend in commercial development can be <br />expected in the corridor. The forecasted future residential, industrial, and <br />commercial development could result in high levels of traffic generation and <br />demands for additional access to TH 10. <br /> <br />To obtain an understanding of the environmental constraints and opportunities <br />within the TH 10 corridor, a series of regional and statewide databases were <br />reviewed and various regulatory agencies were contacted to identify <br />environmental resources and assess the potential for impacts. This <br />environmental overview was not intended to be a comprehensive review of all <br />environmental concerns and does not constitute an environmental review <br />document (Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement). The <br />review process indicates that environmental issues exist throughout the corridor <br />at some level and that additional (more detailed) analysis of possible <br />environmental consequences will be required for any subsequent TH 10 <br />improvement projects. <br /> <br />Identification of Deficiencies <br />The process of identifying deficiencies along the TH 10 corridor consisted of <br />comparing the previously documented key existing and forecasted roadway <br />conditions in each of the twelve roadway segments to ten the established <br />corridor performance measures for traffic operations, safety, mobility, access and <br />the potential for traffic signal proliferation. This process was developed to answer <br />the following critical questions: <br />• Are there deficiencies in the corridor? <br />• If so, where are they? <br />• What are the characteristics? <br /> <br />The process was set up to answer these questions prior to developing potential <br />improvement strategies because not all roadway improvements are equally <br />capable of mitigating the entire array of transportation deficiencies. Therefore, <br />having a basic understanding of the characteristics of the problem allows for the <br />development of the most cost-effective solutions. <br /> <br />Identification, Evaluation, and Selection of Alternatives <br />In order to mitigate the deficiencies identified, a variety of alternative roadway <br />improvements were developed and evaluated. Basically, the improvements <br />focused on improving mobility and reducing congestion by either increasing the <br />number of through lanes along TH 10 or increasing the efficiency of the existing <br />through lanes by converting them from an expressway to a freeway design (this