Laserfiche WebLink
AEr Vr <br /> L: ij <br /> Mounds View City Council Page 5 <br /> illRegular Meeting October 24, 1994 <br /> Commission. Since that didn't happen, the Charter Commission would <br /> either have to call a special meeting or have the members write <br /> letters of pro or con in the Newsletter under a disclaimer that it <br /> did not reflect the position of the Charter Commission. There <br /> would be two articles, one on the pro side and one on the con side. <br /> Councilmember Trude indicated that the members of the Charter <br /> Commission felt it was important to inform the public of the two <br /> positions that were taken before this proposal is voted on. This <br /> is something people in the City are going to face on the ballot <br /> that no one is facing in any other city in the state. She felt <br /> that the people in the City of Mounds View are very interested in <br /> hearing the opposing sides and have a right to be informed. <br /> McCarty expressed his approval to write two letters to the editor <br /> of the newspapers, but was concerned about setting a precedent by <br /> allowing letters to the editor in the official Newsletter. <br /> Linke commented that this would be a means of informing the public <br /> on both sides of this issue. He views it as an informative piece <br /> rather than an editorial, and explained that the purpose of the <br /> 1111 Newsletter is to inform the residents. <br /> Mayor Linke asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak <br /> to the Council. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> Consideration of Development Review of Everest Development Mounds <br /> View Business Park, Staff Report No. 94-1342C <br /> Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7: 30 p.m. <br /> Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator, stated that <br /> this particular property is located within the Mounds View Business <br /> Park. The request would allow for the construction of <br /> approximately 103, 000 square foot office building facility which is <br /> consistent with the other buildings currently located in the <br /> business park. The request is for Development Plan Review, <br /> Rezoning and Major Subdivision. This item was discussed in detail <br /> at the October 3 , 1994 City Council Work Session. At that time <br /> several issues were resolved. The Preliminary Plat was approved by <br /> the City Council at the October 10, 1994 meeting and Ordinance No. <br /> 549 was introduced which would rezone properties included in the <br /> development from their current B-3 status to Planned Unit <br /> Development. The rezoning is consistent with other properties that <br /> are currently located in the Business Park and allow for the <br /> 4111 location of the building in the configuration that was decided upon <br />