My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Chair Doty Correspondence
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1978-1989
>
1979
>
Correspondence
>
Chair Doty Correspondence
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2018 5:28:51 AM
Creation date
8/23/2018 2:51:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
12/31/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 11 <br /> until such time as the bid openings are done or at such time when:.theifinal costs <br /> are totally in. The procedure as outlined by the subsection will lead to confusion <br /> and irritation to the public because the information available to them by this <br /> process will be varied from the final outcome of the project. Furthermore, it has <br /> been noted to the Commission, in Chapter 7, that allowing for the public to express <br /> its opinion on a straw vote will lead to public assuming that they ahve voted on a <br /> particular issue. This may not be in the best interest of the City because of the <br /> ramifications outlined in the comments 7.10. This is unnecessary duplication of effort, <br /> since 429 is being followed. <br /> Chapter 9: EMINANT DOMAIN <br /> If the City were to adopt just the League language it would encompass Minnesota Statutes <br /> for 65.01 , 462.13 through 462.14 and the provisions outlined in Minnesota Statutes 117. <br /> These are more than sufficiant and would surpass the minimal requirements that are <br /> provided for in the Charter language. <br /> Chapter 10: FRANCHISES <br /> Section 10.01 : same as the League language. <br /> Section 10.02: the League language is much better. <br /> Section 10.03: same as the League. <br /> Section 10.04: same as the League. <br /> Section 10.05: same as the League. <br /> Chapter 11 : PUBLIC OWNERSHIP and OPERATION OF UTILITIES <br /> Section 11 .01 : the last sentance in this section is not necessary because it is <br /> already stated in the opening sentance of this section. <br /> Section 11 .02: the third sentance of this section could be deleted "the Council shall <br /> hold public hearings on this matter in accordance with section 11 .06 of this Chapter". <br /> This is really unnecessary since it is provided for under the budget process. <br /> Section 11 .03: is not necessary at all since it is covered in points 11 .01 , 11 .02 <br /> and throughout the budget process. <br /> Sections 11 .04 and 11 .05: are consistant with the language provided for by the League <br /> of Cities. <br /> Section 11 .06: is unnecessary, the reason stated in 11 .03 and 11 .02. <br /> The only comment that might be resonable to make is that it is doubtful that the <br /> City would become an operator of any gas, heat, power, light, telephone utility. <br /> This particular chapter may be better as an ammendment to the Charter as the cases <br /> might arise. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.