Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 18, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Klebsch agreed and asked how this would impact the church. Pastor Klaus stated <br />this would simply delay the churches order of the sign. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson requested further information on how long it would take to amend City Code in <br />order to allow for a full-color sign at the church. Planner Sevald reviewed the timeline noting if <br />all goes accordingly, the project could be approved by the end of June. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the criteria that must be met in order to approve a variance. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson recommended that the item not be tabled but that staff be directed to <br />draft a City Code amendment. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson still supported tabling action on the request in order to receive feedback from <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klebsch was in agreement. Planner Sevald reported if the Commission were to <br />direct staff to prepare a code amendment, this would come back to the Planning Commission on <br />June 1st. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Chair Stevenson/Commissioner Klebsch. To table action on the Variance <br />for the use of non-amber colors on a Dynamic Display Sign at 2848 County Road H2 to the June <br />1, 2016 Planning Commission meeting; Planning Case No. MU2016-001 (VR2016-003). <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nay – 1 (Schiltgen opposed) Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson recommended the Planning Commission direct staff to draft an Ordinance <br />amendment to allow non-amber signs on church property within a residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Chair Stevenson/Commissioner Rundle. To direct staff to draft an <br />Ordinance amendment to allow non-amber signs on church property within a residential <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nay – 1 (French opposed) Motion carried. <br />____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />D. Consider Resolution 1051-16, a Resolution approving an extension of a <br />Variance for reduced driveway setbacks at 5338-5340 Raymond Avenue; <br />Planning Case VR2011-002 <br /> <br />Planner Sevald stated in 2011, the applicant, Michael Kinyon was granted a variance for a 1’ side <br />yard setback for two driveways at a duplex. A condition of the variance is that the driveways be <br />completed within one year. The applicant received a one-year extension in 2012, 2013, 2014, and