My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-15-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-15-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:23:48 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:23:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 15, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />two middle units together, then there would be three owners. Otherwise, there will be a total of <br />four owners. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Miller noted there should not be a requirement for a lot of extra parking. Tom <br />Belting stated they don’t anticipate a need for extra parking and pointed out that the building is <br />not directly on County Road 10. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn pointed out that Beltings are operating in good faith and in a situation <br />where they relied on information provided to them. Now, because of an error, they cannot <br />rectify the problem without this process. He stated he supports adoption of the resolution and to <br />allow the project to go forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked whether the resolution should be amended to indicate the number <br />of parking spaces. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated the resolution can explicitly state the requirement is 43 stalls and then <br />round up to 1 per 200 feet. He suggested the “Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved” paragraph be <br />amended to indicate: …“one space per 200 square feet of office space (43 stalls)” ratio and <br />recommends approval of said amendment.” <br /> <br />Vice Chair Miller asked staff to place her name on the last page of the resolution for signature. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Meehlhause. To approve amended Resolution 827-06, a <br />Resolution Recommending Approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment Relating to <br />Parking Requirements for the Walgreens PUD; Planning Case No. PA2005-001. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson informed the Commission that the Council invites <br />the Planning Commission to attend a joint workshop of the Council and Commission on <br />Monday, March 20, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. He explained the Council is holding joint planning <br />sessions with all Boards and Commissions to be sure everyone is on track with the same goals <br />and mission. The City Council would like to get the Planning Commission’s opinion on various <br />issues and is looking at charting the path for economic development into the future. This is one <br />means to seek out the Commission’s opinion. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated he understands one Commissioner cannot attend the meeting but it may <br />be difficult to find a date that works for everyone. If this date works for a majority of the <br />Planning Commissioners, he would like to keep this date with the City Council. Otherwise, staff <br />will work on a secondary date. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause stated at first he thought he would be unable to attend, but may have <br />some scheduling flexibility and be able to attend.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.