Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 6, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Mr. Klosman explained that he thinks a neighboring property owner called the police. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch stated her dog is kenneled during the day so there is quiet. She thought <br />they needed to revisit this request at some point. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated this cannot be dog specific. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated this was correct. A CUP cannot be animal specific. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson thought maybe they could revisit this and make it a temporary or time limited <br />permit and look at it again in six months to see what the neighborhood feels at that time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller thought because there are so many dogs in the neighborhood, she could not <br />imagine the applicants are the only ones with dogs barking and she thought they could overlook <br />some of the noise. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated the permit is for the property only. He wondered if there are any <br />licensing issues that go along with this. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki stated there are really no other requirements except getting the required <br />signatures, which the applicants have gotten. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland wondered if they could put conditions on the license for specificity. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki did not know if this was possible. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the owner changed in the home, could the license be pulled and <br />reviewed for revocation. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki responded they could do this. She explained that the CUP stated that the permit <br />could be reviewed at anytime. She indicated they could hold the license to three dogs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch stated two dogs are going to bark and adding a third is not going to add <br />much more noise. She stated this goes back to quiet enjoyment of the neighborhood and it <br />seemed like there were many residents in the neighborhood that had two dogs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated they could make the license and CUP limited to 3 dogs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked what the ramifications were for nuisance dogs. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki stated the police are called and will follow up. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller stated the resolution does indicate as a condition “no more than three <br />dogs.” <br />