My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-06-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:30:53 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:30:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 6, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated he would also like to see a time review at six months as a stipulation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause thought it was a good idea but he thought six months may be too <br />long. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller indicated the neighbors have stated the noise has gone down considerably. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch wondered if they could put in a condition that the permit be reviewed if a <br />certain number of complaints are received. <br /> <br />Ms. Fisher thought this was unfair to the neighbors to put a condition on complaints because it <br />puts a strain on the neighbors. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson agreed and thought they should make this temporary to review the permit with <br />another public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull wondered if the neighbors were fine with the time limit. <br /> <br />The neighbors thought three months would be a good amount of time. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated they would have a public hearing in three months if the City Council <br />approves this. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated they are hearing both sides regarding this case, one side is objecting but <br />they do not want to see the applicant get rid of one of the dogs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause asked what would happen if they lost a pet, would they want to get <br />another dog. <br /> <br />Ms. Stoltz stated that they do not always necessarily need to have three dogs, but that they <br />choose to take pets on individual cases. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson suggested that in three months, they could still make it temporary to be revisited <br />again. She stated they do hear the dogs even if they are in the house. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull asked if the dogs are kenneled when left alone in the house. <br /> <br />Mr. Klosman stated they are not. They are still trying to get used to the area. <br /> <br />Ms. Stoltz stated they could try to limit the areas in the house the dogs would be allowed to go. <br /> <br />Ms. Robinson asked if the City was going to work on the permit relating to it going with the <br />property versus the property owner. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated they will be.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.