My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04-16-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:46:09 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre commented that Section 516.13, Subd. 1, does not indicate a formula but says that <br />the City Council may suspend or revoke upon finding of a violation. He then commented that <br />the tobacco ordinance has a clearly defined process for violations and he sees no clearly defined <br />process for violations of this ordinance and that concerns him. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre commented that Section 516.14 addresses prohibited acts but there is no definition <br />of the consequences for those prohibited acts and that concerns him. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre indicated he served several years back on the latest version of the County Highway <br />10 Steering Committee and the Steering Committee made recommendations to Council that were <br />ratified by Council as to the improvement plan for County Highway 10. The first was safety and <br />the second was to make the area a true corridor and more attractive. The City spent tens of <br />thousands of dollars for engineering and plans and the upgrade will cost $3,000,0000 to <br />$5,000,000 and he asks why would the City and its residents pay that much money to upgrade <br />the corridor and allow a pawnshop in the center of the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre indicated he wants to give the business the opportunity to run a pawnshop but <br />wants the City to have the means to say run it in a different area. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre commented that the City has given Pastor Enterprises opportunities in the past to <br />work with the City and those opportunities were ignored by them. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre asked Council to digest the information and consider requiring a different location. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked where Mr. Sonterre would locate the pawnshop. <br /> <br />Mr. Sonterre indicated he liked the separation that new Highway 10 provides as it divides the <br />City. He then said that the area is commercial industrial and a pawnshop would have no impact <br />on housing, churches, schools or parks located in that area. He further commented that a <br />pawnshop is a destination shop and does not need to be located within a shopping center <br />environment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked what space was being looked at in Moundsview Square. <br /> <br />Mr. Przetycki indicated it was the 4,000 square foot space between the frame shop and Penny <br />Pinchers store. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked for the name of the business. <br /> <br />Mr. Przetycki indicated the name would either be Security Pawn and Jewelry or Security Loan <br />and Jewelry. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff would review the suggestions of Mr. Sonterre and provide <br />feedback to the Commission if necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.