Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 3, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />6. Public Hearing and Discussion Regarding Variance Request for 2817 Laport Drive. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated that the applicant has requested an 8 foot variance to the curb cut <br />requirements due to the fact that the contractor failed to obtain a permit and the work on the <br />driveway has already been done. She then explained that the applicants were having issues with <br />backing their truck and fifth wheel trailer up the driveway due to the slope and it was causing <br />damage to their vehicle. The reason for the driveway improvement was to eliminate that issue. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated that Staff does not find a hardship in this instance and has provided a <br />resolution for denial for consideration. She then read a section she would like to have inserted: <br />Now, therefore, be it finally resolved by the Planning Commission that the applicant shall be <br />notified of the right to appeal this denial to the City Council. The appeal shall be submitted in <br />writing within 10 business days of the adoption of this Resolution. <br /> <br /> <br />Mrs. Thompson of 2817 Laport Drive addressed the Commission and explained the issue with <br />the slope of the driveway causing damage to their vehicle. She then apologized for the <br />contractor not pulling the permit and asked the Commission to consider allowing the variance to <br />leave the driveway as it is since the work has already been done. <br /> <br />Mrs. Thompson indicated that they have a close neighborhood and none of the neighbors have an <br />issue with the driveway. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Miller asked whether the slope of the driveway was changed when it was paved. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson indicated that the driveway now slopes about two inches rather than the previous <br />10. He then asked whether it was a big enough issue for the City to require that they remove the <br />pavement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that other residents would want the same thing and that is why <br />it is an issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked whether the contractor had indicated they were to obtain the permit. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson indicated he was told they would be getting the permit. When he found out they <br />had not, he immediately came to City Hall and applied for one and was told that the drawing did <br />not meet code and a variance would be necessary to allow it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated the Commission needed to resolve the issue to the best result for <br />the City and the applicant and, since the slope has been changed and the pavement that needs to <br />be removed is only from the right of way to the street he would recommend that the applicant <br />request that the blacktop company do so at its own expense and that they provide fill or grading <br />to maintain the same level as the remaining blacktop. <br />