Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 3, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated she had reached a representative of the company and was told by him <br />that they accept responsibility for the error and said it was due to a miscommunication. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson indicated he would like to keep the driveway as it is since it is done, but if <br />necessary, he can have the pavement removed and grade it for grass or crushed rock. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Miller indicated there are criteria that have to be met for the Planning Commission <br />to grant a variance and this case does not meet the criteria. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn assured the Thompsons that the City would work with them to negotiate <br />resolution of this matter with the blacktop company. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Miller asked that the language to be added to the Resolution be read. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki read the language. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Johnson. To Approve Resolution 744-03, a Resolution Denying a <br />Variance from the Maximum Curb Cut Width Requirement to Allow a Previously Constructed <br />Driveway Addition to Remain. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Public Hearing and Discussion Regarding a Request for a Side Yard Setback <br />Variance at 5072 Brighton Lane. <br /> <br />Planner Prososki indicated that the applicant wishes to construct a second story addition over the <br />garage but requires a sideyard variance to do so since the home is constructed on a small lot and <br />the garage is within 8 feet of the lot line. She then indicated that Staff feels the hardship <br />requirements can be met in this case as the lot is smaller than the City’s minimum standards and <br />the home is under the minimum square footage requirements. The front yard is sloped in such a <br />fashion that expansion that way is not feasible and in the rear yard there is an existing deck and <br />mature trees. <br /> <br />The Commission agreed that this addition would be an improvement to the home and noted that <br />there is no expansion of the footprint of the home and no expansion of the encroachment into the <br />setback as the expansion is directly on top of the existing garage that is 8 feet from the property <br />line. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 746-03, a Resolution Approving <br />a Variance to Allow for an Eight-Foot Sideyard Setback for a Living-Space Addition at 5072 <br />Brighton Lane. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________