My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-06-2002
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-06-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 6:51:40 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 6:51:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 6, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Kathy Peterson of 5185 Long View Drive indicated she had not been receiving notices on this <br />matter and asked the City to update its records. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Planning Case No. VR01-012 <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson explained that the Days Inn had requested a variance to increase the height of <br />its sign and, after discussion and review of pictures taken by Staff, the Commission had directed <br />Staff to draft a Resolution denying the variance. He then commented that the applicant, after <br />hearing the discussion, agrees that exploring other options for signage is a better alternative to <br />raising the height of the sign. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Miller. To Approve Resolution 688-02, a Resolution Denying a <br />Variance from the Maximum Sign Height Requirement to Increase a Pylon Sign to 65 Feet at <br />Days Inn. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson commented he was glad to see the 65 feet mentioned in the Resolution. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Review Planning Commission Bylaws <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that the Commission reviews its bylaws annually and noted that, if <br />any changes needed to be made, they would be made by Resolution at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he was comfortable with the bylaws and noted some changes were <br />made last year. He then commented that he has a question concerning the nine members versus <br />the seven members. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the City’s Code specifies that the <br />Planning Commission is a membership of nine individuals and noted if the Planning <br />Commission wanted to change that, the bylaws would be inconsistent with City code. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated that the Commission was originally a seven-member Commission <br />with two interns who were non-voting members. He then commented that two years ago Council <br />changed the membership to nine members and the Commission has trouble keeping nine <br />members on the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller indicated according to the bylaws on Page 3 the staff reports and minutes <br />are supposed to be discussed during the agenda session but that is not what the Commission is <br />doing. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated the positioning of the agenda was changed to reflect the ability to take <br />minutes and record that part of the session.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.