09-18-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission September 18, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 5 ________________________________________________________________________ Chair Stevenson indicated those types of things are regulated by the EPA. ______________________________________________________________________________ 6. Planning Case VR02-008 Planner Atkinson indicated the applicant has requested a variance from the front yard setback requirement for signs to construct a business identification sign on the property located at 4759 Old Highway 8. He then noted this is the same type of request as the recent Ace Supply Request but each individual request must meet the criteria in order for the variance to be approved. Planner Atkinson indicated that the Code requires that the sign be located 15 feet from the property line and the request is to locate the sign one foot from the property line. Chair Stevenson commented that the applicant makes a good case for himself in his narrative. He then clarified that a variance of 14 feet was what was being requested. Eric Lien of Midway Industrial Supply indicated the landscaping would begin one foot from right of way and the sign would be setback about three feet from where the landscaping begins. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 711-02, a Resolution Approving a Variance from the Front Yard Setback Requirement to Construct a Sign on the Property Located at 4759 Old Highway 8. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Planning Case DE02-007 Planner Atkinson indicated the applicant had requested a development review to construct additions totaling 36,300 square feet. He then indicated that the expansions are planned for areas that were designated for future expansion. Planner Atkinson indicated that Staff reviewed the development plans and all City Code requirements have been met. Commissioner Zwirn asked if this addition was considered when the property was originally developed. Planner Atkinson indicated that the addition had been planned for with the original development.