Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 2, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />_______________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson commented that the three days was added for temporary signs and limiting to <br />three periods would be reasonable and consistent with other parts of the Code. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson suggested finding a way to make sure that parking and obstructing views <br />is not an issue. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that the proposed language indicates that parking shall not take up <br />any parking spaces needed to meet the Code requirements for that property. He then said that <br />Staff should be able to determine if there is an issue with the proposed sale location before <br />issuing the permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson suggested adding language to indicate that the permit could be revoked if <br />the activity causes a parking or safety issue. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson commented that the building owner may be the one <br />taking out the permit. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Staff to further define the language to indicate that the activity shall not <br />cause parking issues or the permit would be revoked. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson commented that most of the businesses in town have just enough parking <br />to conform with the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated Staff could come up with language to address the issues raised. He <br />then indicated that Staff should be able to review the proposal and determine if there would be an <br />issue with the location and/or type of activity and would have the right to deny the permit <br />request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked that some language be added to require no more than three <br />consecutive 10-day permits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if there would be an occasion where a permit would be taken out at <br />one location and then the applicant would pull a permit for another location and move to several <br />properties in town. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that the proposed change would apply to the property itself so a <br />vendor could potentially move from one property to the other with the consent of the owners. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff would review that issue and suggested that Chapter 500 may <br />assist in addressing the matter. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked how the Pepsi truck moving to all the gas stations in town would be <br />addressed. <br />