My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-2002
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-20-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:34:19 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:34:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 20, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />restored with sod or landscape, and the third is that the resolution of approval be recorded with <br />Ramsey County. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Song. To Approve Resolution 715-02, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of a Development Review for an Expansion to Edgewood Middle <br />School. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that this matter would be before Council on December 9, 2002. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller suggested adding language indicating the resolution should be forwarded <br />to Council prior to the adoption of the minutes. <br /> <br />Director Ericson added the language to the resolution. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Planning Case VR02-012 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated this matter was set for a public hearing and <br />discussion of a variance from the minimum setback to allow a previously constructed driveway <br />located at 2256 Lois drive. He then explained that Staff became aware of the issue by driving <br />around the City and finding that the driveway was being reconstructed right to the property line. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the contractor had faxed the driveway permit application to the <br />City although the application did not include the fee or note the distance between the driveway <br />and the property line. Staff sent a letter to the contractor who did not respond. An inspection <br />later revealed that the driveway had been completed between the time the permit was requested <br />and before the permit was issued. He then indicated he had attached correspondence from the <br />property owner to his contractor as well as correspondence from the City to the property owner. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he had received input from the neighbor who abuts this property and <br />that property owner does not have an issue with the driveway. He then indicated he had received <br />another comment from an additional neighbor who also does not have an issue with the <br />driveway. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff noticed four or five other driveways that were constructed in <br />a similar manner in that area. He then asked the Commission to discuss the matter and provide <br />direction to Staff as to how to proceed. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the applicant was not able to attend this meeting as he is out of <br />town. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.