My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-20-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:38:26 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:38:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 20, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 661-01, a Resolution Denying <br />a Request for a Variance to Allow a Second Curb Cut at 8081 Red Oak Drive. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted the Resolution, if approved, will require a <br />further stipulation that the right of way and boulevard area needs to be restored. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the proposed driveway was Class 5 or asphalt. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Class 5 driveways are no longer allowed by City code but noted a <br />parking area of 300 square feet or less of Class 5 is allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson clarified that the grass on the boulevard would need to be restored but <br />noted the Class 5 could be left in place for a parking area. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated a permit would be required but noted the area could be used for a <br />parking area. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson clarified that five (5) feet of the boulevard and the curb cut would need to be <br />replaced if the Class 5 were used for a parking area. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted the Resolution would be amended to require that a permit be obtained and <br />all City codes complied with. <br /> <br />Ayes – 2 Nays – 4(Hegland/Kaden/Scotch/Johnson) Motion failed. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked the Commission if it wanted to direct Staff to bring a Resolution for <br />approval of the variance before the Commission at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted the next Planning Commission meeting would be held on July 18, 2001. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden asked Director Ericson to comment on the public safety aspect of the <br />hardship requirement. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted that the Planning Commission could give added weight to the safety issue <br />and can add that to the hardship but noted the Commission still needed to establish that there is a <br />hardship. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden asked if the Planning Commission should make a change to the City code <br />for future situations. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted that the Planning Commission can suggest changes to the Code at any <br />time it feels it is appropriate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson noted the new curb cut would need to be in compliance with City code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.