My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-05-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
09-05-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 7:39:23 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 7:39:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission September 5, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />industrial property or any subdivision of more than 2 lots, except a development where public <br />utilities were previously installed would require review by the Planning Commission and <br />Council. He further indicated that since there are currently two major subdivisions in process he <br />felt this would be a good time to review this chapter of the code. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he felt that the development should go through the review <br />process but not each individual lot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland agreed that the review process should be for the subdivision not the <br />individual lots within the development. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson inquired as to how the Code has been interpreted in the past. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated he is not sure how the Code was interpreted <br />in the past because this is the first major subdivision since he has been working for the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated he felt the intent of the Code is to review the subdivision not <br />the individual buildings. <br /> <br />Chairperson Stevenson suggested researching other cities to see what they do for development <br />review. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson commented that anything that has the potential to <br />impact the surrounding area would need to be reviewed. He then stated he would research the <br />matter and bring it back before the Commission for review. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Consideration of a Resolution removing Travis Cerny from the Planning <br />Commission due to non-attendance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that this Resolution is before the <br />Commission as a housekeeping matter to finalize the vacation of Travis Cerny’s position on the <br />Planning Commission. He further explained that Mr. Cerny had not attended a meeting since <br />May 2, 2001. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Johnson. To Approve Resolution 671-01, a Resolution <br />Removing Travis Cerny from the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />8. Staff Reports <br /> <br />a. Previous Council Action <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.