Laserfiche WebLink
~ Mounds View Planning Commieslon <br />Pa~r,e 4 <br />~ AoUert Olazer eCatrd that• the Planning Commf.seion feels that <br />entablishing an intei~~han~e for *ha upcraflin6 of Red Oak Drive woul~ <br />not be in thg best intereat of tha reeidenba of thie aonununit;;. <br />Therefore, ha would iike ta again suggeat thaC the ~lans tn establiah <br />an interahange on Red Oak Dr1ve be eliminated, Don Maakebsn etated <br />that Che reasons for thie are: 1. 8ingle =amily dwelling PQ01.dAT7Y.0 <br />of the driveWays oing onto Red Oak Drive nreate safaty hazarda. <br />2. Red Oak 3ahoo~ie very ulose and it would he detrimental tn the <br />welfare o£ tha ehildren. The eohool Ys approximately 20 feet from <br />the at,raet, 3• Dividee the oommunity one more time. <br />(NOTE TO STFVE: Measure Red Oak Schoul~s west entry from the Pym <br />to tlte street right of way and ta the pavement). <br />Robert Olszer stuted that the Commission had met with the Ramaey County <br />Highway Aepartment. The engineer from 8lainn came in after the meetinR <br />was ad,~ourned anQ prosented plana that we~e whol].y unacceptiable. <br />Sinae the Metropolitan Council 3taf'f Reviaw has realize~i that <br />the SnEerchange would be eatabliahetl oubeide of Mounds View bor•dere in <br />the City of Blaine it is ^espeotfully requested that the two conaider <br />a request to intercede on thia matter irt ttie behalf of' the Ci~y, <br />of Mounde View. It te noted in t,he Metropolitan Council Staff~Revi~w <br />of our comprehensive plan that bhey sbate that the NortHorn extengion <br />^~ of Red Oak Drive to aerve arteri~l to the interchange, Re3 ~ak Drive <br />~ "la not designed to function in this manner.'~ <br />~ <br />Herb~ra Haake stated that in the 2nd paragraph, pagA 4, there ie <br />no dl.ffarance in the type of ring road syatem so the Commisaion ehould <br />nob ht~ve ho aonsider their 2nd paragraph: She further stated that <br />the Commisaion feelo thab our Compreheneive Plari ahould inoor~pora'ce twn <br />documenta developed by the MTC aaliod~~~De~si~ ~n ~an_d Maintensnce.of Flus- <br />1'telsted Road Im rovements.and Model Code, o- ~ r Traneit mpac na ys s. <br />~gar ng eragrap , page 4,~Tte.'~aaTce ata~~ tha~ e ommisaion <br />wauld like to amend the transpartetiori policy section, (3oel "C'~, to <br />mnclude aoordinating all city planning with nalghboring municipalities <br />aleo. Regarding page 4(H1, a aorrection should be made on bhe Mouuds <br />View map reg¢rding m3nnr arterials and collector streets. County Road I <br />sho~ald be deaignated only as a co].Sector East of U3 10 acco:ding to the <br />offiaia7. mc+Cropolitan map. <br />Don Meckeber. atated L"nat the Commieaiun requests the technical <br />information from the MeCropolitan Council to enable us ta consid~r <br />incarporation of Air Support, Air 8pace.and Noise Criteria in our <br />comprPhenaiva plan and zoning ordinnnao. <br />Qerald Foas mentioned that on pags 5:~A) j,~ is oup lon~+-range <br />gaal tn atudy the necda f~r providing housing for our elderly in the <br />future. Ms. Naake stated that the MaCropolitan P,cview 3tef~ noted that <br />from the 1970 ceneua that• Mounds View hae a high proportion of iCs <br />~~ <br />