Laserfiche WebLink
Mound~ Viow Planning Commission ~$~~ 3 <br />~ Robert ~lezer moved Cliat we raaommend to the Councii bhat they <br />approva ~ha requeat of 9ohultsr ~ Drogger invol,vin~ properbies <br />looated at approximately 8312 & A316 Pieasant Vlew Dri.ve, with the <br />lagal description as previously etated. This motion is to approve <br />the areatton of three lota: Lot 1(Narth iat) mesauring 253 feet <br />on the South, 91 faet on the West, 28q on tha North; Lot 2(center <br />lot) meaeuring 233 feet on tha sauth, 91 feet un tho West, 253 feat <br />on t;P~e tJorth; and Lot 3(oQwth lot) maasur~ng ?11 feet on the 8ottth, <br />91 on the Weat and 233 on the North. These lots are aub~not to a <br />3Q foot road right of way ease~ment un the East lot 11ne, plue an <br />additlonal 5 foot utillty eaeament on the Gaat aiiA Weet gides of theae <br />lotd. This motion wae seoonded by llon t4ackebett and carried. (6 ayes) <br />ftobert Olazer then moved tio reaonsider hie previoue motion to <br />ror,~aziy inolude the abal~donment of the prevloua lot apiit relating <br />to Traot A. Thirt motion wue seconded by iN~. Haaice end car,ried. (6 ayos) <br />Ms. Hask~t atated that the main motion ?s again bofora the Commisaion. <br />Robert fJlamer moved to amenl the main question relatl.ng to the <br />subdivision and t~ inulude in that motian the faQt thaC there wSll be <br />the aqandonmenb oi' Traat A of the 3ehulter & HrogRer s~.~bdi•riaion. The <br />reat oP the motion atands ae previously stated. Thia motion wae <br />aNaon~ied by Don Maakeben attd aarried. (6 ayee). <br />Ms, Haake asked: All in favor of the msin motion with the <br />~.~a~ amendment, ao signify. (6 ayes). <br />'+~"" Oesald Fose returned to the Commiasion at 8:58 pm. <br />Ttie Metropolitan Council staPf r~enmmendation regardin~ Mounde <br />View Compreheneive Plan UpdrsLe wa~ then dSsauased. <br />Me. Haake inquired as to whether Midwest Planning wauld put <br />1n the i~ew tables. Counailman 3helqutat raplied tihst their oontrsat <br />wae oomplered r~hen they printed the 100,aopies and he aseumod the <br />staff Would du !t. Counailman 3helquiet a],so mantioned that the <br />Canncil is go1.n~ to considcr thie Monday evoni.ng at their agenda <br />oese3on. They would like the Commiseion~s suggeeted ~hanges by then, <br />Garald'Fooe swggestad that acroea from the civia canter, it <br />could be a po~:a;ible area fnr some ^uture aubeidized houein~ for the <br />elderly. 'They should be put Sn areao that hsve been xoned as modium <br />and high density. Mr. Shelquiet atatad th.at this does f~ot need to be-- <br />there nre alternatives to this. <br />4erald Fosa further stated t;iat on p4Ae 3, 2A, ++e do agree wlth <br />.he Metropolitan Counc'1 Re!~iew Sta:f that our S olasa functional <br />olaesifination system regardinp, transportation be Qeleted, anr] use <br />the new propoe~d transportation p~licy plan. <br />k,,~„j <br />