1976-01-14 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-6- Mr. D'laqk~ben etabed that he hse no etatus to base hia opinione on, but the 24 hour tenniu courts seem to funotion very well, ~ ) NUTE TO 3TEVE from Mr. alazer: Qheok to sae ai~y problamK that other communitiea have had with regard to outdoor tennia aourte with resper.L ta lighting, noise, etc. H& I; They will need,a full drainaFA map, eto. Will loae parkinp, sp6oe by piling the enow "neatly11. A motion wae madc by Oerald Foas Co recommend to the Counail that they give a speoial uae permit to the properLy at 2828 Highway 10 to Aoland W. Miller requeeting a 40 foat vnrianee on the east and west fc^ sideyard netback, and n five ;oqt variance on the front yard setbaok and that we grent them the varianee on the off atreet parking requiremente ao that Chey wi~.l provide 53 epaces and will reaeive from thair ad~olninR neighbor, the Pac Company, a ~oinC facilities parking axmangement. On the sereening requirements we would add that they landscapo eround Cha entire building except fQr the norL-h part whiah faces the ?ae SulldinR. and that they orould also meet aur 1'encing requiremente. On bhe naiae ' requi.rements it will be continRent on tal.king wlth ad~oining neighbora before vre reach a ftn~il dec'oion on rod~e eNez~aLiu:1 hoi.tr.s. T.he drainage requiremante must paed through the Engineering Department, Rice Creek Waterahed, and.othex appropriate age~m3ea. 'i'he exteri.or materials of the bullding and landscapin~3 w111 all have to he approved by the Planning Commiesion. The lighting would 'nave to conform with 1;he eode. The reason the 40 faot variance was allowed was Uecause the exlating ~~ ordinance calls for 50 fopb stdeyard setbanke but in our nen~'p~e~3osed ~ or.•dinanoa the eideyard aetback will be either 20 or 25 feet, so thqt it ~ wi11 probably be only a 10 or 15 foot vari,ance from the naw sidcyard aetibacks. Consideration was p;iven to the fact that th~ nearea* residential housine was 9~ feet on the west and an apartmenC bui'lding Sa GO faet on the east of the propoaeti building. This motinn was rsecor.ded by Paul Fedor. R'ha motlo~i was defeated. 6 nays 2 aYea Mr. 6lazer atated Chat he had voted nay as bhere wae not enough aetback an8 the parkin6 was 2nadequ~te. Phyllio ~ilanchard voted nay b~cause under ou^ present zoning she could caot vote for an 80 faot variance. Under the new vari.ance ehe wouZd have gone along. The next item nn Lhe agendq wes Mounda View Associatea. Proporty lnvolvec: Mounds View Square Shopping Center, requeeting a v~.riance on a~.gn height. Represanting Mounda View Shoppinp Center was Tom RuVelson. He requested a variance on the sign helght of ~I feet. Tt Se presently 2(i and they ere etskin~ for 35. Ms. Haake told him that btounds View bhould be two words, It is goin~ t~~ have to be spelled cor_ectly on the aign. Ms. Burmeiater asked the reaeon for the height change and Mr. Ruvelaon re~lied thist hia firm designed the ehoppi»~5 conter, 81nce it Se used for civic as well as commercial evenba there wan no practical way to ad.varl:ise exeept through a reader board. So as not to create a hazard we came up with the present deai;~t~. Bcaause the 41gn will be located in the parking lot area we will have to raise the base up 3 feet. 'i'hus 1 ` St viould only be 6~3" whlch would create a vandalism problem (lettere ~/ stolen, etc.) They wauld like to have the reader board witt~ enauSh spaee