1976-01-14 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-5- tAr. MoMahon had a suggEetion to ehange the raaquet ball e.ourta. If it were rearranged and redesigned the layout--how mueh varianae do !•~e hsve to live wiLh? Me. Haake aeked if he aould ahave off 20 feeb tn aome within the aode. 61r. t~iuGt&hon aai3 ~:o. !'ett!~ you give me 5 feet? Me. Haake eaid that the ldea of a varianoe goes againet me. After coneiderable disouaeian a new oonoensus of opinien was aekad for: Mr. Roasman; After all tihe disoussion T have deaided I would go down to e 25 f'oot satback Lut that ie as far. We will be amending our oode and it hasn't even been enacted. I,.a~it to sticl< by the aoflH. Mr. Fona: I vrould go with tho vari~nae that they request. I think this is probsbly one of the better uses for the land and an aseet to the oommunity. Me. Blenchard: We have to go with the code. For 80 feet I would have to say no~ On t~~e new code of 20 .Ceet Y would lat them have a 10 foot variance on the sidea. If you caz~ rationalize someth~ng ~hat ien't in effeot. Ms. Durmeist~r: I t,hink that we should etiok bo the oode. Dott~b think we shauld ahsnge the lawe to fit Che situstion. Ruther atiak wi~h whati we have got and 11ve with a 40 foot varience and thore is nof: muuh more use for it except for apartmenta nnd we cahnot s'cand mo^e density. I would give the'vai~iance because i.t ie a uniqve eituation. Mr. FRdor: I would go with tho variance beceuse the new ordinanee is oniy going to be 20-25 feet and i~ was C::e intent to keep the open apace between the buildings. In thie aaea the open apaoe ie thera. Mr. Mackebett: The Gommiselott ohanged thR sebbaaka to 20-25 ~o av modern, anct we are not in m pusltxon at thia timQ to start mnking a~~ariance. ,--~. Mr. (ilaxer: AbatAtrl until Midweat Planning states wn~ther they feel ~ ,' tF,ia ia a har9ehip on the land. `--' Ma. Haake: Would go along with what the new code says, 20-25 feet, beesuse we wrote this and it le our duty to aixppor~ it. There are 4 ayee, 3 nos, 1 abstention. But no Cormal motion as yet. Regarding C. i,n the Inepeator~e Report, Aren and building si.ze requiramenta. Thep erP willing to lower ib sa they are not asking for a variance. D. Off-atreet parki.n~ requiremente: have a legal document with the Pao Company. Mr. TempQata eaid that Mi~weat Planning suggeabad 53 Pgrktng apaces. 1'~ times the people playin~ in relatlcn to their nars. Me. Surmeieter atated that she d1d not feel that 93 ~paces w111 be enough (40 from Paa and their 53)• 1 E. Screening requ3rements: Ms. Haake atated they will go along with ( eome acreening a21 the way around exaept the portion that abuts the Pae Building and ti~e driveway. F. Lighting requiremento: Already discussed. G. No],ae requirements: Ms. Haake atnted thaC Lhere shou2d ba eome ~ suggestion that there be limitations put on the outside pleying time., Mr. Mackeben said that ho could aee no problem as the handball court will bu3'fer u lot of noise. Mr. Fedor said 1f i~ goes 24 hours and there are complainba we will quickly i find ouC. I Mr. Fose: we must get input of the neighbora and not set a time now. I Ms. Burmeister: We don~t lcnow what it is going to be like. Wa are not 1 in a poaition t~ set a tim?. Mr. (t~.azer sugqested compsring notes with other communitios: ~~