My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976-04-28 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
1976-04-28 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:22:36 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ <br />-2- <br />rr~ Me. Haako atstdd that in the future when people come in <br />~ for eubdivi~ione~ the Commiasion ehould encouragu them to <br />~m go the m~jor subdivieion routa whan sewer and waL•er are <br />stubbed in for such. <br />6arnet D1. Nelson 8310 Lon Lake Rd. <br />MSP B anc ar -ROSSman to te e Mr. Nelaon's requast from the <br />table. 6 ayes <br />Mr. Nelson requeeted an extension of 30 Qays. <br />MSP (Glazer-ROSeman) to retable Garnet M. Nelsnn, 8310 Long <br />Lake Rd., request for major subdlvision until May 26. 6 ayes <br />Naomi Mae Eaetman, 8420 Red Oak Drive - withdrawn at Ms. <br />Ea- atmnn s regueet. <br />Ms. Haake noteQ that etaff had requestad Planning Cornmioaion'e <br />approval to .review 90 day or older sulidivis.ion files which <br />had not heen recorded with the County. Ms. Blanchard qunatiunad <br />whether the suhdivisione were co ba drappad or would the <br />parties be contacted? Steven Roo9 indicated he wuuld aend <br />lettera eayinq that tha Planning Commiasion would lika tu <br />review the file, no fee, just review to be aure it is up <br />to cod~. <br />/""'1 MSP (ROSeman-HUrmeigter) that the staff thoroughly review <br />~~~ any 90 day or older Planning Commission approvals not <br />recorded with the County to see if thay are still in agroement <br />with city policy. 6 8Yo8 <br />C1are D. GeSrts 7600 Knollwood Dzive. M~. Haake stated tha . <br />request o• Mr. Geerta to ma e a ex ating garage into a <br />family room and build a new double garage in front of tho <br />exiating garage that will extand furthgr than the normal <br />setbacks for houaing al'ong that street. The new a3ditior~ would <br />b~s 33.8' from the street. Deaanse of treea in the back loC <br />and hie desire to create more living epace by maki.ng the <br />existing garaqe into a family room, 1t was determined that <br />Mr. Gecx•tn roque~c was the best solution to his problem. <br />MSP (Fedor-BUrmeister) to approve the variance requeat c~f <br />Clare D. Geerte for 7600 Rnollwood Drive for a front setback <br />of 33'8" from the street right-of-wr~y. The new zoning code <br />that hasn't been adopted yet allows this sort of setback <br />a.r,rangement without even a variance zaquired. The average <br />predominant eetback on this 61ock is considere3 <br />52'. The;:ef~r-;, we are areating an lti'4" vaiiance. 5 ayes <br />Roasman - 1 n+zy <br />Mr. Rossman explained hie t~ay vote beiny because <br />tha garage will protrude too far in fr.ont of the Yiousej <br />~,,, 20' is too long. <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.