1976-06-09 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTE5 OF THE MOUND3 VIEW PLRNNIHQ COMMISSION dune y, 1976 u:A!' The Mounde View Planning Commission was called to order at the City Hali by ite chairperson Barbara xaake at 7:35 pm on Wednesday, June 9, 19T6, The Tollowing members were preaent: Phy111s Blanchard, Paul Fedor, Robert Olazer, Allen Zepper and Aarbq.a Naake. Absant were: Oerald Foae, D~n M.aokeben, Nancy Burmeisber and Robert Roaeman. The minutes for the May 26, 19~6, meeting were amended a~ follows: ~n the lst page, 3rd paragraph, 2nd aentence, delete the word "with" and insert in 11eu thereof the word "wnere", and in the 3rd sentenae delete the word "vsriances" and insert "verianee ie". On page 2, lat paragraph, delete tha worde "ie a large lot, and divlsion of the baak lots ~ntc 4 aeparate parcels, The paraele are Uaund by Long Lake Rd and areenwood Drive, t~td" a,nd inaert in lieu bhAreof: "e.re 7 lots; 4 lots numbered 1-4 faaing ~reanwood Drive and 3 lota numbered 5-7 facing Long Lake Road." F'ollowirtg that delete "the figurea now requested are" an3 ti~ssArt: "Tne depth figuree nnw requested on the west side bnund by 6reenwood Dr1ve is". In the last sent•ence of that paragraph between L•he worde "axcepb" and ~'sewer" insert the word "storm". On page 3, 4th para~raph from the bottom of the p~~e, 2nd sentence between the wo^ds "a' and "gerage" insert the ward 'double'~. Page ~i, 7th paragraph, laet aentence, deleca the "period" and insert: "at 195 feet in from the weat 1ot line rather thari at an equal diatance between Cfreenxocd ~-~ Drive and Long Lake Road." ~-J MSP (Filanchard-Fedor) that the minutea be approved ;;s amended. 4 ayes 1 abst Mr. ^lazer ahstained as he was not present at the May 2ti meeting. ITEMS F~R CONSTDERATION E. E. (iuetafson Property ictvoived: Lots 5 to 2~, Slock g, areenfield Ylat 2 ftezoninq (ft-1 to R-2) Ms. Haake exp181ned that thia item had been tabled for 30 deys and a mation vras neaeasary to take i,t from the table. tdSP {Qlazer-B2enchard) to take from thP table Mr. fiustafson'a appliantion for a rezoning. 5 ayes Mr. Guatafson stated tYiet h~ had received a r,dpy of L•he new development ~ contract and bhe stipulations in 1t wouid "rub him out" as far as development was conaerned. Ori6inaily they wanted to reznne all the land, Lots 5-23, but if they must abide with the cantraat ±t will reduce ±hem down to 4 lot3. ~ Mr. Roae told him than it reads worse than it ia as all the items would not perbsin to his development. He su~3eated proceeding with the rezoning ~ as there wiil be a development contrsct rec~uir.ed of him, but probably not that aevere.