Laserfiche WebLink
-g- <br />Counailmnn Shelyqisb stated that bhe City ACtorney advised the <br />Counnil that einoe ~he original opecial uee permit wa~ granted afCer <br />a public hearing there has to be a public hearin~ set to ehanae <br />'"'~~ it and thls is set for thia f4onday evening. Further, he wants <br />the minutes by Friday nf this week Por th<~ Counail me~ting. <br />Ms, Burr.telster aeked A1r. D¢ire if he would be willing to ra3se this <br />to lOQ and he replied that his nresenae is not to make compromises <br />but to disouss the petition. <br />MSP (Dlanahard-i'edor) tn ad,~our~n the public hoarinp, at n:45 pm. ~ ayea <br />The regular meetin6 of the Planning Comminsion wae reconvened. <br />~Dalb~er,_'~a 9unn ~side Eata~te~s ~ <br />roY~perty Ii~volved: 8419 Oroveland Rd <br />Ma~or subdivision (2 lots i.nto 6j <br />Preliminary F1aY Recomtnendation. <br />Me. Haake stated tha~ the minubes of May 12, 19q6, ~ive xheir <br />reoommendations a.nd only a motion ia needed. <br />M8° {Foas-Mackeben) that we reconvnend Co the Council that they <br />approve nalberg's Sunnyaide Esbates, 0419 Gr~velnnQ Rosd, maJor <br />subdivislon, cont2ngent upon removing the ooncrete slab on Lot 3 <br />bei'ore ihe finsl ~,lat is app:ove:~, secord?n~ to the px-911minary pla~ <br />/"~ dated June 14, 1976. 7 ayea <br />~..~) !'harlea Hermann <br />F'roper~y Znvolve3: 8~50 Long Lake Road <br />Ma~or eubdivision.(1 lot into 4} <br />Prellminary Plnt Recouunendationa <br />Ms. Haake stated that they h3ve. before tham T1r. Hermann~s preliminary <br />p].at dated June '~, 1976, and that P1r. Nermann nor hi~ represer.tstive <br />appsered,' Tn reviewing tha plab whioly in exactly a5,the dketch <br />plan was when it was presented to thc P1anning Coinmission cn May 2F, <br />197b, the Planning Commiesion wrauld like the Councl7. to adhare to <br />the reoommend'ations that wero made in 9:he 9ommiesion~s motion uf <br />May 26, 197G. 'PAr. Hermann'a argument that the ehed i;hat 3s on a <br />aonorete slab on hia east lot would have to be removed on a.n equ&1 <br />1 loC split ia Sncorrenx. In reviewi.ng the preliminnry plat it indioatea <br />that mith an equal lot aplit he wt.ll not lose the bulldinP that is <br />on the conarote slab. t1r. Hermann~s other argument that,hie garden <br />i would be lost nn an equal lot split is also inaccurate--it wcu).3 nlc+o <br />i be parti411y last on the unequal lot sp1iC h~ requesf;e9. F'or t,he <br />i minutes and convenieneQ of the Council Ms. Haake re-read the motion <br />I` into tonight's minutes that was originelly made on t4ay 26, 19y6. <br />i t4SP (B1t;nchard-FoaR) that we recommen9 tu tkae Counail that, in Eoing <br />~ with our policy of equal Iat sp11L•s and seeing no herdship in this case, <br />that they deny the petition of Charles fiermann, 6360 Long I,[~ke Road, <br />, "'", for a ma~or subdivision. That motion pesaed Uy 6 ayes, <br />~ ~ ~'/ <br />