Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />,/~~ Approvai frnm the Cngine~ring Departr.~ent with regnrd to the h~lding <br />~ pond, conrlnF;ent uPon apprev~l af the PCA, R1ae Creek Watar Shed, <br />~'' C3ty F'ire Marshall; an aaaeptable building nontraot with the City for <br />' the devolopment of the property, poatinp an nooaptable bond frnm the <br />i City, and an acaeptablP. ~.ighting plan and aurb auta, and obt~ininp, <br />ths proper eolution wi~:. regsr3 to eaaementa to the City W~ter Towor, <br />' approvsl of the final landeaaping pian both in the north and eouth <br />ende of the property and also on the eaat of the property, with a <br />40 :oc~ ~~een area, and a varinnoo of about 70 foet in bhe truoking <br />area; finsl approval of this overall aoncaht would be p,rented sftor <br />~11 ut tlieae uenaitionn have Ueen met. <br />5 ayes <br />Peter Jordan <br />t~ropu~r y-involved: 74'/4 Spring Lake Aoad <br />t4a~or aubdivlsion (1 lot into 3) , <br />Thia l~t sa 195.97 on sprSn~r Lake Road nnd 319,60 on Broneon Drive, <br />tdr. Jorden is requestin~5 3 luts; Lot 3 would be 195.97 x 13~~.60, Lnt 2 <br />would be 90 x 195.68 nnd Lot 1 wuuld be 90 x 195•49. Mr. iloee <br />st~ted that it meets a11 the requirements, an exieting shed has to <br />be romavad. <br />14r. Jordar~ atatod tfiat it ie definitely a poc+aihility that they will <br />eell the home when the lots heve bean sold. <br />~~ Ma. Haak9 reiteruted vrhat she had otated at the July14 meeting: "that <br />~-~ , this voEe an the survey Se not• binding on the final vote on the <br />preliminary plat beaause the fu7.1 Commission is not here". 8he stated <br />that the Commission tonight ie of a different makeup, <br />idr. Jordan stated that one o}' the problems is trie f'essibility of the <br />road. There la no queation that a road could go down, iuut doea the <br />City and the residents really want a ruad. ~dr. Rose atated that <br />there would be a public fiearing with letters going to almor~t overyone <br />on that'bloak. They coui3 inclu3e somc+thing in'that letter whioh <br />would end all.possibilltiea for a pract3oal road syatem to gd through <br />and the onus o-iould t`~en be on the neighborhood. <br />P98P (BUrmelatormHnalce) to deny Peter Jordan~e requeat beaauoe nP the <br />feasibility that a road could be put through on thia block. If suah <br />a rond woulrl be put through Mr. Jordan coulc~ otill gct ;:cta, two <br />lot to face the new road ~;oinp, throuk?h and not Dronaon. <br />3 ayes <br />2 naye <br />t4o. Ilaske stated L-hat ~4r. Jord¢n re4ueats a publ'_c haarlnp; on the <br />ma,]or aubdivislon at 7~~sAr3nP; Lake Road. <br />~ F~_r_a~~ncis W~~id e~r <br />`` ~ rope2' rty involved: ~425 Red Oak Dr. <br />4~„~ P1a~or subdivic~ion (1 lot lnto U) <br />..,;.,. . _ ,. ., <br />