1976-08-25 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~dINIITES OP THE t40UPID5 VTfi4! PLANNTAJiI COMM1IIS5ION AugUnt ?!i, 1976 ~ The f~Tounde View Planninq Comminaion was called to order at Lhe City Hall by its ohairpereon Harbara }[aaice at 7:30 pm on 4tednesday, August 2y, 197G. The tollowlnp; memBers were presentt Nancy Burmeister, Qr.ruld'Fose, Robert aJ.azer, Paul Fedor, Phyllia 6lanchard and Barbara Hankp. Absent were: Allan 7.opper and bon 6laakeben~ The minutea for the Aup;ua~ 11, 1975, n~eebin~; were correr.ted as followat on page 2, ldt paragr~~h, delotc the P?.~rure "90" and insert in lieu thereof the figure "10', and aftnr Che vrox~d "area;" an4 before the word °i'inal" indei~t: "and Lhe grcen nrea of H dietattce of epproximate'_y 90 feet'~; b'urbf~ec, hir. Olazer tuanted the reaeon for hie vote "nay~' to be noted in the Pete,r. Jord;in matter (page 2) n3 fallows: "Nothing had ehangad since blr. Jordan's first visi.t, none of the circumatances had ehanged surroun3ing this iseue." PQr. 6lazer eAntinue9: Aarely do we get approval from Ric~ Creek or the ?CA--perhapa we slioulcl be thinking about wording a resolution to indioate that we will review their aommenta and try to oome up wi~h a resolution. ~4s. 6urmpiater stated that we nevcr see the reporta and when we a~tc for tihem we never get them. We ahould aok that tt copy of these reports be sent to the Planning Commiseion. MSP (Hurmeister-Fedor} that the minute~ be approvpd ss corrected. 5 aves fMr. Fosa had not ~l ,~, yet errived) `L,,,,~J Ma. I{aake atated that we should set a policy if we are goin~ L•o aomment on sket•ch plaria, Ma. Burmeister said that by abstaining we ehauld have less problema. tdr. 6lazer felt that if the people took the trouble to oome dovrn they do deserve every conai.deration. He also felt that 3t was the poor t~ttendance recurd that gets tham int•o ~rou6le. tds, Haalce said that sometimes the memberahip does change thQir vote themselves. The problem ia that the people coming ln feel that it is an offinial vote--perhaps the straw vote ehould be avoided. ~6e. Rurmeiste: sa19 that thls does giVe them an indication of what they have to c~~rk~crct. lJe et~n only net on the formal thingv--the people with ~uat• the sketch plans could b~ left until the Tormal meetin~r lu over if the,y luttt vrant our ideaa and sugqeationa. ~ir. Fedor atated tha~ those with'only a eketch plan can only be given eaoh 1r.div3dual's viewpoint, He felt thslt the straw votes shouZd be aliminated alea. , tT6IsS POR CONSIDERATTON Gd 13rickaon roperty involved: ~2G5 Spring Lalce Ropd Pdlnor subdivielon (1 lot ir~to 2) t4r. Rose gave the folloorin(~ dimeneions: upring Lake Rd 80 feet north, where you go east 218 feet, nor~h 100 £eet, south 127 Ts~:~, west ~0 feet, °, F~ubh 53 feet, Vrestarl,y 35z•13 feet. The propoeal ~s to split the west 1 1 210 feet which is in line to hia neighbor to the norbh. The vrest lot a•~ to be 80 x 218, the eESt lot to be 180 x 214.].3 axcept the southe?~st corner 53; x 70; ~•thieh ia owned by the City.