1976-08-25 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-3- tAr. 61~zor asked if Chere wae any alternative such as an elevated sign on the pretnisen and she replied that it w~ould have to be awfully P,igh """'' as they are two bloak to the easC. Councilman Shelquist stated tuat this would appea^ to h1m aa a Permanent sign. The length ot tlme that they tivish to put it up is temporery, poesibly, but it should not be tre¢ted as tem~orary under the defini~ion of the ordf.nanoe. Staff otated that it has to be aonsid~red n bil2boerd beoause it Ss off its property. Dfs. Haake steted I:hat ae Che Launching Paci a2ready has a permanent si~n Lhere should not be anothcr permanenY, si~n on the property. 3he further stated tha~; thoy would have to ~i.ve iC t•~ro varifixtces r.ither way. AIo. AurmelatQr ~tated that she would oonsider it permanent, hov~ever. MS (Fedor•~6lazer) to reco^mend to the Couneil r,hat they der.y the Specisl Use Permit requeat of hiid Continent h1anaF,ement nt 2375 H~.gh!vay 10. s'' Ms. Burmeister amended the motion, because their request was for a "rF temporar.y sign, but upon reviewing it we find that it does not f4t the " definition of a temporary nlgn &t1d 19 more of a permanent eign. If it io trented ~s a permanent sign it is a violation of being lesa than 3aa feet from another permanenb sign on the property, as aacording, to 39•al~l'2), it allows only on~ Permanent sign on a locatton. This ^( amendment was seconded hy Mr. 41a.zer. ':I ids. Blanohard wanted to know if it ~ould be treated as a temporary sign '`I (~~' with a time 11mit and Mr. Olazer stated that that viae why he was av,,,i wondering if it le a sou~id ordinance. ~ A vote was called for on Che amendrt~ent, 6 ayea A vote vras called for on the main motion as amerided. 6 a~es ~ Ms. Dlanchard stctbed that she votgd in favor of the mo~lon 6eeause of our ordinance and t:hnt is on our boc~Jts has to be upheld. At the same time ! perha.pu We should look further into the possibility of a temporary ni~;n I for a certa3n period af time (9~ ~1aYa or 6 months}-_where i~ ie a legal ' business askitt~ for hnlp. I I PQ3. Fiaake stated should we recommer~d to the Councll that 3n a oase like this somebhirig should be done, f4a. Burm~~.~tier aaid that they ehould ( i.ook for an alternativa. Ms. Haake sugge~sted they check into purchasing + existit~~ bill bnard spane. f4r. O7,azer stated that ire seem to have a lot i of national adv~rtising that doesn~t benefit: trie residents. I ; Ms. Naake told 4~Is. Kaater that the requeat for the Special Use Permit ' will come beforc tl:e Counetl tha 2nd 14onday of September. Mr. rind ~drs. Bob Lestina, 6939 Flea3antvlew Drive, atated that they were ir~terested in garnp,es and storage sheda, what conatiCutes a gartj.ge docr etc. t4a. Ftaake stated that L-here should be 6ome discusaion as to larger stora~e aheda. t CounciLnan Shelquist stated that at the lnst Co~ancil meeting (after ~-~ Wilbur Johnson's reque~t was granted when lie brought his ahed alze down to 216 --it wes passed as a variance} he made the motion that we inerease ~he e2ze of sheds to 216 feet becauae Sf they wera goina, to grant the Johnson varlan~e, a7.1 citi.zens should have the right to it.