|
~ ,,,,,„.i
<br />:izt~~omFS of~ m~ts t~aouNOa vzr•.~u
<br />PLAN11IN0 COPit1IS3'~OtJ
<br />Sentem~ei~ 22, 197G
<br />Tlie tdoundo Vleiv PlannLng Commiesion was called to nrder at the City Ffall
<br />by itr, chairperson ~arbara Haalce at 7;30 pm on N7edne~dny, Septe~7ber 22,
<br />197~• 'Ptle fo11u471ng mem~ers ~•rere present: Nanay Ourmeloter,0erald I'osa,
<br />riobert Poas,RoLert (llazer,Pau1 Fedor,Phyllio l3lanchard,Allan 7,eppor,
<br />Don biaclceben and Bart~ara ]faake,
<br />Tlie minutes for the September F1, 1~7G, meeting ofere aarrected as follows:
<br />lst nfl~e, bth paragrap}i, 4bh nentence, After the worcl "di~tanae"
<br />inccrt L-he eiords "in a normal aituation" On pa.ge 2, last senLence,
<br />the vote should have read "3" abstain3, r~aLl~er than "2" On pnge 3,
<br />puragraph ~, oentence 2 delete the ~oorQ~ "x 2;?G.00. T~~e remaining
<br />ttilc rear lots rrould be 1~10 x 22'/.11 and 1~10 x 227.11" and inaert in 11eu
<br />t}iereof the rvords, "feet wide. 'Pf~e norLh lot (Sohm) vrould be !JO x 4~3.e0.
<br />The tvro remalning lobs faotng 6rovelaud rrould be a0 x 226.0). The toro
<br />lots facing proposed ICnollwood would be ti0 x 227.11." t-lr. Qlazer
<br />as)ced that the follovrin~ be added to the GeorEe Payne petitlon: "The
<br />petitlon for the development of the road with its six 31Ened residenbo•--
<br />all of theee residento vrouiQ not be fronting on bl~e propo~ed lCnollwood
<br />Drive. Out of the six, five ~re affected. Only one home did not have
<br />to aign'.° On page 5, 2t~d para(;raph, lst 3entence, a comma should be
<br />in~erted after the 3vord "on'~ and before the word "the".
<br />I~iSP Chat th~ minutc:a Ue approved ag corrected.
<br />8 aye3
<br />(~'~'1~ STEMS POR CONSID~RATTOAI
<br />\.~
<br />Francla W~i~~d ~e~r~
<br />ronerty ~vo~ved, 8425 Red Oak Drive
<br />I~ta,jor subdivision (Widger Addition Preliminary P1at, 1 lot into 4).
<br />lot facing fted Oalc Drive vrould be'75.0J. x 239.Oy. The south lot
<br />would be 87.01 x 239.07. Cn the ~aat Hide, facing Sttnnyside, the two
<br />lots botn would be 81.01 x 23~~. Staff stated that services are provided
<br />for two 'lots frontin~ Sunnyside and r~re available for both lots fronting
<br />??ed Oak Arive. Lnts 2,3, and ~I vtill have substandard fronts~*ea (hardehip)
<br />nsitina for o. varlanae a~ the csetback of the gttrage to tne lot lint~ on
<br />Lot 1 is los~ than 5 feet. The exi~ting drive~ray on Lot 1 should t~e
<br />moved to cotiSorm with the 5~ netback requirement~. Utility eae~~mente
<br />are proper, bUt staff etrongly urges a 10 Poot eademenL- for utillties.
<br />Applioant proposes to subdivide lot 52£3 x 162 into 4 lote. The north
<br />M6P (Foss-Blanahard).~to:fiecbmmend~.bo the Cdunci~l thab bhey;:ap~rova `i:^.a
<br />ma~or subdivlsion request of Pranois YHd~er, ~~12> Red Uak Drive, crcrdtinp,
<br />4 lot~, the dimensions already stated, ~~rith the variance on the driveway
<br />on I,ot 1 of 2 feet and a verianee on the gara~e setback oP 1.1 feet on
<br />the back and .7 on the front, and utility e¢sement~ on the rear 2ot
<br />lines of 5~'eet. The varZances on the 3etbacks for the lot froritagea
<br />are due to hardahip situation~ because there.are homPS on both sldea
<br />of Red Cai! Drivo; also *.o remove the drivevray from Lot 7. ~ ayes
<br />~ PlOTF: t4r. Glazer atated for the record that the 10 foat easemenC tha~
<br />the sbaff recommended on Red Oak n:ive waa not 2•equoated so as'to preclude
<br />plans to iriden Fied Oak DriVe.
<br />
|