My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-05-11 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
1977-05-11 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:20:35 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~.,r., ,,~ <br />.. ~ <br />~ Willard Haro <br />3048 Courtty Road H2 <br />Minor Subd~vision (one lot into two) <br />Enginaer Hubbard stated it was an oversight they were not on the <br />agenda. Their request is for a minor'subdivision of an L-shapod <br />lot on County Raad H2 and the extentian of Pleasant View DriVe. <br />The north lot would be 104.zG~ x 2Q0.07'. The south lot which <br />r~ould Erant on extended Pleasant Viaw Driva would be 438' x 1.08.58' <br />which would leave the south lot landlocked until PSeasanL View <br />Uriva was extended. <br />Commissioner Zepper left et 10a43 PM. <br />MSP (Haake•Foss} recommend the Cou~tcil approvo the minor eub- <br />division for Wi2iard Haro at 3U46 ~ounty Road H2, makiag a lot <br />104,28' x 200.Q7', and anuther lot of 208.Sfl' x 4~8'. This racom- <br />mendation being Fc~rwarded on to the Couacil should be accompanied <br />by a full staff report on this minor subdivision. <br />4 Ayes <br />3 Nays <br />Commissinner FedoY felt that the sbnve item should be tabled and <br />find out the thoughts un tha road from Fridley, Commiss3oner <br />Burmaister was in agreement with th3s and Eurther stated thac <br />,.~+~ she is not opposed to the lots, but since ataff did not process <br />l 3 this and'we hnve no input, she did nnt £ea], queiified to make <br />~~.s~ any judgement. <br />Red Oak Drive <br />Discuss policy cnncarning possible interchange at County Road J <br />Jim Bangstrom and Pag Mountain ropreaented the Mounds View Citi- <br />zens Group and read their statement to tffe Planning Commission, <br />which was put into tha Red Oak file. They continued and stated <br />that bfinnesota UOT's timetable ca11s for threa routes to cume up <br />wlth ona f3n~I one. Thia wili be iaputted ~1nto tha envixonmental <br />statemant. Tiietr intantion iy to Qe4 the Planning C~mmi~sion and <br />Council's support and cooperation. They feal the Council must <br />taka a definita decision in this maCtar es thay feei this inter- <br />chanae wili.hurt Mounda View tremendouely. <br />MSP (Heake-Glazer) that we recommend the Councii reafFirm the <br />ststement tHat was msde in ouN adopted Comprehensive Plan Incated <br />on Page 74 which reada ee follows: "Uistrict 5... the mnjor <br />issue confrontin$ thia Dis4rlct is the potentiel upgrading of Red <br />Oak Driva 2o arCerial statua. Should this occur, t,he neighbor- <br />hood would be fraamented es a rosult of th9 increasr,d traf.fic <br />valume on Aed Osk Drive. Sasod upan Che naighborhuod fragmenta- <br />tion which would result, the City should discourage the conseruction <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.