My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-05-11 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
1977-05-11 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:20:35 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
« <br />~ of un interchnnge in Blaine of new Highway 10 with Red Oak <br />extended and the uccompanying upgradir~g uE Red Oak Drivo." <br />7 Ayss <br />hls Mountain stated the decision on ane of those possibilitles <br />is this month. They want new Highway 10, but ut tho same time <br />they do not wnnt to discourage constructiort of it~ they want to <br />discourage th~ impact of the intorchange on the C~ty. If the <br />Counci] wi7.1 make a definite stand a~: tc. the adverse affects it <br />will bring to tha community. With an interchanga along Hwy 10, <br />we will end up with pressuro to ana of our roads, Any road <br />thst runs north of Old Hwy 10 cou2d realize a pressure of being <br />extended throu~h to New Hwy 10. The drawing showa3 an inter- <br />chunge at proposed Rod Oak Drive had axtended, evan if we were <br />not hooked up to it, the pr~ssure would be too great. One sug- <br />gestion was to have t7ie interchange at Highways 10 and 65, end <br />bring back a sorvice road to their industriel land. The "do <br />nothin~" rouCe moans wo chnnge d3rection. <br />Two documents were handed in to be put in the Red Oek Eile: <br />(1) Mounds View Citizens' Graup and Our Goa2s and (2) tha state- <br />mar.t that was read to tha Plenning Commission. <br />Mx• Derg~trom stated if they could get the3r support, they will <br />go to tha other Councils and do whatavar they have to do Lo <br />~ a~compllsh tha goalc. Ms Mountai.n spoke to Councilmember <br />Baumgartnor as follows: the Council can object to what it will <br />do to our community, if ynu aro ha»ing problems otherwiae. <br />Commissioner Mackeben askad if there were any advantages to having <br />that intsrchange up there7 Por exemple, to those south of Hwy 1U <br />who want tn go up north on the wenkends. We could attempt to be <br />good naighbors and sao if it wnuld be beneficial to .Bridley. <br />Ms Burmeister moved to recommand to the Council that they con- <br />si.der all the ramifications of any interchange located in Blaine <br />on New Hwp 7.0 es ~t relates to Mounds View, We would suggest an <br />interchange possibly located at the area where 65 and New Hwy 10 <br />would intorcapt, with a frontage road back to the east into Blain9's <br />industrisl/business area. This mntion was secondad by Commiss3oner <br />Pedox. <br />Commissioner Gluzer moved to amend tha abova motion as follows: <br />recommend to Counc3l that they join tha citizens~ task f~rce in <br />opposition to tha ~unatructior a: ar.y ir.terchen~a in Blaine <br />bet.v:ean Hwy,65 and 35W, because of its long-range ramifications. <br />The amendment waa secondnd by Commissianer Hnake and carried. <br />7 Ayes <br />A vote was taken on the main notion es emended. <br />7 Ayes <br />\../ Meeting adjouxned ae 12:00 midnight. <br />RespactEully submlited, <br />Recording sacretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.