Laserfiche WebLink
- 10 - <br /> <br />Uavid Jahnke <br />~ Property involved: 8428 Eastwood Road <br />~ Minor Subdtvision (One 1ot lnto two) <br />" R-1 Devetopment <br />Mr Rose sCeted that Mr Jahnke got catled to work and reqtlested the Comnission <br />approve it if at a11 possible. <br />Ms Hnake stated the peCitioner nor his representative are here, but Mr Jahnke <br />was here earlier, but had to teave. He was caiTed to work and was not able to <br />stay in attendance unt11 10;45 Pt1 when this item came up, Ne requested we con- <br />sider it and forward our recomnendations on, if possible, and we feel we would <br />like to do so. <br />Appllcant requests to subdivide a iot approximately 472' x 127.5' fronting both <br />Easthvod and Suttttystde Rcad, The lot frontina Eastwood woutd be 127.8' and 269.6' <br />The la: fronting Sunnyside would be 117.5' wide and 234.1.5' deep. <br />Mr Rose stated both lots meet area and frontage requirement~. IL cannot be sub- <br />dlvfded Further.. 7he lot fronting Eastwood has an existing dwelling which still <br />meets setback requirements after the subdivision reyuested. Drainage and ut111ty <br />easements shoiild be required 5' along the rear of both 1ots. Also, an additional <br />5' of road easement for Eastwood Road. <br />MSp (F^der-Burmeister) that we recommend to the Cauncil they approve th? minor <br />subdivisinn of David ~ahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, creatiny two 7ots, lha toi. <br />franting Eastwood v~auld be 127.8 and 234.5', and xhe lot €ronting Sunnyside vmuld <br />i~ be 117.5' wide and 234.15' deep. Drainage and utility easements wi11 be required <br />~,..~ 5' aTong the r~ar of bath lots and an additional 5' for road easement on the 1at <br />fronting Eastwood Road. <br />6 Ayes <br />Randy Svendsen <br />Propewty involved: 7901 Eastwood Drive <br />Variance {build9ng setback - yarage additionj <br />Appiicant requests a variance for the setback of his garage off of Hillvlew Road. <br />He wishes to consy:ructinn a new garage keeping the same sett x k as the old garage <br />but eliminating the breezeway. <br />Mr Rose Said Lhat the setback oF the old garage was 19.6 from Hillview r19ht of <br />way (33') and the new addition W111 malntain the same 18.6 setback requiring a <br />variance of 11.4' for !be continuation of a nan-conforming use. <br />MSP (Glazer-Meckeben) to approve the variance requested by Rand,y Svendsen, 7901 <br />Fastwoud Drive, for the setback of h9s gerage off of Hi7lview Road, the otd <br />setbeck was 18.6' fran H111view Road, and the new addition wi11 maintain the <br />same 18.6' aetback requ9ring a varlance of 11.4' for the continuetion'af a non- <br />conforming use. This certainly represents a personal hardship as the house wa5 <br />built before the ordlna~ce was established. <br />6 Ayes <br />'Wpl~' <br />