Laserfiche WebLink
Octobar 12, 1977 Page 3 <br />~ hItNOR SUNO NISION OF PROPERTY AT 7555 SPRiNG IAKE ROAO <br />Official Rose reported that Mr. Gwiazdon has requested to subdiv9de his 165' <br />Spring Lake Road frontage lct into two equal 82.5' 1ots. Both lots exceed the <br />square footage requirements and all buildings meet the minimum setback requirementa <br />and both sewer and water servtces are avaitable in the street. <br />Commission Member iepper asked !f Y.he house on the property was a rentai home, <br />Mr. Gwtazdon reptied that it was. <br />MSP (Haake-Bianchard) to approve Mr. G~aiazdon's request for a minur subdivision at <br />7655 Spring Lake Road, dividing the 165' lot into two 82.5' wide by approximately <br />228' deep lots. It is the policy of the City to divide a lot 165' widE equally, <br />so a 2' variance ~~ou1d be granted on each lot. 5 ayes <br />REVTEW OF SINGLE 6AMILY_DISTRICT HOMF OCCUPATION ORDINANCE <br />Chairpersnn Haake read Lhe Mound; View home occupation ordinance and then read the <br />crdinances of Crystat, Arden Hilis, Coiumbia Heights, Fridley, Spring Lake Park, <br />Roseville, Sliareview, Coon Rapids and Robbinsdale. <br />Sandra 6eaurline, 6929 Pleasant View Drfve stated that she felt that if a neighbor <br />had a dispute with anet.her nefghbor, that person would be in tr.~uble when requesting <br />permission for a home occupation. <br />~'' Barb Carlson, 5239 ~effrey Drive asked if beauty parlors were allowed in the present <br />~~ ordinance. Officiai Rose replled that beauty parlors must be approved by the State <br />and that one wouid 6e allowed ur.der limited business in a number of areas. Council <br />Member Baumgartner stated that ii is a77owed in the ordinance now, and Chairpersnn <br />Haake staCed that it is a7lowed with only one parking space `or a customer. <br />Mrs. Carlson statad that she has the perfect setup for a beauty shop in her home and <br />would tike to start one and would be doing is only part time and would be only having <br />one customer at a time. <br />Commission Member Zepper reported that in going through the Mounds View phone book, <br />he had counted at least 80 home accupations that were listed and was sure there wet~e <br />many that weren't 1lsted. <br />Mrs. Beaurline staCed that she was given a letter of permission from tl~e C1Ly in 1972 <br />to oparate a dog grooming business out of her home, which she is sti11 doing. <br />Barb McC7uskey, SBO1 Long Lake Raad stated that her husband was an engineer and was <br />operaCing out of their home and asked what the purpose was in discussing the ordinance. <br />Chairperson Haake replled that the discussion had been braught up at the request of a <br />~erson who wanted to operate a beauty parlor out of her home. <br />Councilmamber Baumgartner pointed ouL that while Shoreview's ordinance was ct~sest to <br />- what Mounds View had in mirid, 3t did have a large loophola in allowing minor repair <br />>ervlces. He stated that there have been problems in Mounds View with auto repair <br />and washing machine repair and so forth. <br />