Laserfiche WebLink
•Qctober 12, 1977 <br />~, ~ <br />Page 4 <br />,,~.~ Commisslo~ blember Durmeister stated that she ~~~ould ha interested in knawing aihy other <br />r communities prohibit beauty parlors, Officfal Rose replied that many communities do <br />, not allow them because they feel that while Lhey might start sinall, they could easily <br />i grow into a larger operation and it is hard to draw the line on what is too lar~e. <br />Commissian hlember Zepper stated tilat the State requires a exit directiy to and from <br />a beauty shop. Official Rose replied that the State ~:~11 accept a door to a haliway <br />2o an exlt door, <br />Chatrperson Haake questioned if it was necessary to change the code to a11ow beautN <br />shops. 5he stated that the main point in atlowing or not aTlowing a beauty shop <br />seeried to be whether a comnercial 'hair dryer tiaas mechanical equipment customarily <br />found in tha home. <br />Comnission Fedur stated thaC the Pianning Comr.iission mertibers must consider whaC it <br />is that creates a nusiance. Cauncilmem6er Baumgartner replled that they must estab7lsh <br />what is a nusiance and what is not. <br />Bobby Oietz, 2612 Ridge Lane stated Chat she failed to see the importance of being <br />expticite as to noise or whatever and stated that the City should not discriminate <br />against those who might work a~ night. She also stated that the Bicentenniai Comnittee <br />had taken a poll, using the Mounds View phone book, and found over 80 families that <br />were self employed that were 11s*.ed. <br />Cortmission 14ember Fedor asked if ~ nusiance ordinance had been considered, <br />Mrs. Mc~C]uskey stated that there would have to be several cars before a nusiance com- <br />plaint could be filed to which the person eiould hae•e to respond. <br />Official Rose reported that for the people who come in to see him request4ng to have <br />a tiome occupation, he has to turn about 99% of them down because of some area which <br />would not meet the code requirements. <br />Commission Member Burmeister stated that she felt the Alanning Commission should have <br />input from those people involved, such as the neighbors and so forth. <br />Comnission Me~nb~r Fedor suggested that a,pecia'! use permit could be required for <br />home occupations that did not fit !nto the ordinance. <br />Offic9al Rose recommended that the Planning Coimnission could hold a hearing and make <br />their own decision if a conditional use permit should be granted. Then, if it tvas <br />denfed, Yhe applicant would have the right to go to the City ~ouncit and appeal. <br />Cha.irperson Haake stated that she would prefer the Councll have the finat say in <br />approving a11 applicatlons. <br />Chairperson Haa!ce advised Mrs. Carlson that she should wait before setting up a beauty <br />shop 9n her home until the ordinance has been def!ned and clarifled. <br />Commission Member fedor recommended that the Planning Commission meet to,ether w1Ch <br />the City Council and City Attorney and together come up with an ordinance. <br />c~yairperson Haake requested ~n h2h~7r of the Planning Comn9ssion that Adiainistrator <br />~ Achen contact Attor~ey Meyers and find out when it would be convenient foP M m to <br />attend an agenda meeting, at which the Planning Commission members wouid be in~oited, <br />to discuss with him the present home occupation ordinance and any changes that <br />