Laserfiche WebLink
,December 14, 1977 page 3 <br />~ i~icorporated wtth L•he pTat 1P Lot 2 is approaed. <br />' Block 2 creates one lat and one outlot. Lot 1 meets or exceeds lot size requirements <br />and lot remnant outlot 8 1s created, approximately 49' x 256'. <br />B1osk 3 creates three lots, and a11 lots exceed frontage and square footage require- <br />ments and front Pleasant Vtew Drive. <br />An additional ten feet of uCillty eas~nents for the lots fronting Pleasant View Drive <br />would be given for underground utilltie~. An additionai etght feet woutd be required <br />on Sprtng Lak~ Rcad. but the additional propased ten foot utility easement would not <br />be necessary. Servlce stubs to the lot lines are availabie for all five lots front- <br />ing Pleasant View, and services are available in the street far the new tot fronting <br />Spring Lake Road. <br />A devalopment agreement wouTd be required to be drztvn up and execuCed for the <br />devclopment. <br />OPftcial Rose reported xhat Staff recumnends denial of the plat as presenCed wlth the <br />outlots but that if Mr. NArstad desires to create buildable lots from the outlots <br />as he has donA wlth Lot 2, Btock 1, he should be required to do that with the <br />ptatCing. If the awners of the ad,~acent prnperty are unwilling, the outlats cauld <br />becoms tax farfeit land. <br />Officiat Rose recomnended that 1:he plat could be approved with changes and ameridntents, <br />- Chat 61o~k 1, Lot 2 requil^e that the Rosenqutst praperty Lo the north be incar- <br />porated 1ntQ the plat, that Block 1, Lot 3 and OutioC A be combined to meke one 1oL. <br />and that Bloak 2, Lot 1 and Outlot B ba combinad to make one lot also, und that n <br />development agreement with the City be drawn up and executed. <br />Mr. HarsCad stated that he has spoken to all the owners of the ad,~acent property and <br />that while Mr. Rosenquist is willing to se11 that this time, that the other owners ~ <br />are not yet ready. He stated that he has shown Outlnts A arid B on the plat because <br />he plans to someday make arrangements with the other owners to make legal lots. <br />Hr. Harstad aiso sLated that he would pay off the aesessments, if necessary, for <br />approval. <br />Comnission Memb9r eurmeister asked how much land was between Outlot e and lot i, <br />Block 3.. Official Rose replied that ~cfiere was 134'. <br />Officlal Rose stated that the ad~acent property should be purchased and platted now, <br />for approval. Mr. Harstad replted that no one was ready to se1T yet but they would <br />1n the future. <br />Official Rose also poiated out that Chapter 42.09~ Subdlvision 6, Paragraph 4 refers <br />to lot remnents and requires that they be combined with adjacent properYy. <br />Comnission Member Glazer stated that Mr. Narstad's comments and plans make sense <br />about future development of the p~aperty but that he did not feel the Comm~ssion <br />shauld go ugainst a wrltten law. <br />: Cammisston Member hiackeben stated that if Mr. Narstad wouid agree to pay off the <br />\~ assessments, it could be approved. <br />Chairperson Haake stated that she also felt Mr. Harstad's comments did make sense <br />