Laserfiche WebLink
January 25, 1978 <br />Page 2 <br />Cemprehensive P1an c7assifles the street as a~1nor ertertel. <br />' rOffic4al Rose staLed tha~ lot 6 is 252' iong and t30' deep and that if M~•. Eigenheer's <br />plan of a cul-de-sac iwas to extend into the northerly property, tliree additionai 84' <br />iots couTd be created with the ad~oining property owner. Lot 12 lias an existing <br />single family home end garage fronting County Road I and both meet minimum setback <br />requlrements with 8he proposed ptat. <br />4uts 2, 3, 4, 7 and B elt have 80' frontages and lots 16, 17 and 18 have 72' frontages <br />which are below the 85' code requirement. Lots 2, 3 and 4 have 10,500 square feet, <br />tots 7 and 8 have 10,400 square feet, lot 14 has 10,600 square feet and 1ot 20 has <br />10~700 square feet, which are all below the 11,000 square feet required by code. <br />Lots 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8 are substandard in both ftrontage and square foatage. However, <br />the present plat could be revised to create standard iots with 85' frontage and <br />11,OOQ square feet. <br />Official Rose r~eported th~t the presented street plan creates a cul-de-sac appr~ximaCeiy <br />820' deep, wfiile for emergency purpases, cul-de-sacs are generaliy less than 300 feet <br />deep. Mr. Eigenheer has provided for a 20 foot waikway and emergency easement betwean <br />luts 10 and il to County Road I, which Staff has reviewed with Chief Fagerstrom and <br />Chief Grabowski and concluded that the use of an emergency easement would be inadequate <br />and most 1lkely presant probiems, such as having cars drive through, and keeping it <br />open during the winter. <br />A~onnection to County Road I direct7y sauth oF the cul-de-sac 7s not feusible due to <br />t~e exis#ence of the St. Paul Water Works line at a high grade. However, it could <br />6e possible Co connect at the east property 11ne, due to a change in grade. <br />"-~ Officiat Rose reported thaC Staff had consulted with Mr. ci~enheer and Keith Harstad, <br />Che property owner to the north cancerning a 10oped street which would have kwo <br />connections to proposed Edgewood Orive, one of which would be approximateiy at the <br />aenter of the applicant's property and one at the comnon lot line between the two <br />awners. The taoped system would create the same approximate number of lot,s and <br />would create more footage of street, but provide; for a loop street system in the <br />event of necessary r.mer3ency access. Official Rose also stated tbat evehtually a <br />ho7diny pond tn the area will be necessary, and that the City cou1d assist the <br />fi111rtg oo Pi~•. Eigenheer's ar Mr. Harstad's property, rather than having it hauled <br />away. <br />OYficiat Rose presented two ather alternatives, a connection to County Rqad I at the <br />east property line or a connection to Oakwood Drive co the north, but stated that <br />neither were very feasible or desirabie. <br />Official Rose stated that with the approval of the plat, tdr. Eigenheer must be required <br />to petit!on for servlces or insY.all them himself under the revision and inspection <br />of the C1Ly, lncluding sewer, water, storm seaier, concrete curb and gutter. Under- . <br />groundelectrical services and street 1lghts should b~ required of tha developer. <br />The existing grade creates no unusual probiems for the deveiopment, but so11 condi- <br />t9ons Gecome less desirable on the norther3y 100 teet. The easements shown on the <br />preiiminary plat would be ad~quate but any revision to the plat would require Add1- <br />tionai easemer~t censidaratiuns and revisions. <br />`-J soilrcondltion$ke M~ke0lsontrepliedhthati herhad not~hadPitPcheckeddy~~en tested for <br />Ccmmission t9ember Glazer asked if clearance would be required from the DNR because of <br />