1978-03-22 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'f Mardt 22, 1978 Page 3 anc for eaEety £aatnra. I» tho intereet of publia eataty, a drivecusy of thie ~]eaign ~vriair.fi cwul/.t have twe9 curb cuta, is rmre feasible. 6 ayee VARIANCE ImpJE3P OF GAFa! GOLdiAFt - 7400 9ILU$R I,1it~ A74D t?fficial Fbee reporked that Mr. c3~sham wae nequestinq tha eame variancs that t~. b]rorick had and the tvro were neighhoi-e ~ an3 that t~. Gorhaon' a hane ha~l been built for eele. Mr. Gnrham etated that he v.wl.d lilcn to put in a h~ox'x'es elx~e drive becauae he tw8 had a back-axrnttid dri~e is~ th4 past and felt a haree ahoe t+ould be mach aafar, not rnly for the amar o£ tf~e hane, but• also for vieitors. t+1,P (SUrn~leter~Glazer) that the Planning O~miseirn, acting ae a Ha1rd of Pdiust- ment and Appeals, grc+nts the varlanoe zeguest of Gacy Gorh~n, 7400 Siiver Lake Ibad for a horse ohoe drive. Alttrnx3h thti City ~ under Sec. 40.7, 8j etates cnl.y one cuzb cut per eingle .family hare, silvar Lake taxd is designats~3 as n mirar arterial ma~i, azri for safety factora. in the interest of public eafety, a dr1v~,.ay bf thie deaign whi.ch i.wl~ hsve two curb cuts, is mare Eeasible. 6 ayes MA70R S!&)D2VISIW I&~.IIST ~' EIGR~ER BUZLIEFL4, INC. - 23&1 CCUM'Y 'id~B I Of.ficial it~se reported that tha applicant has requaeted a~rproval oE a reviecd pre- liminazy plat ca~msietilr3 of 21 Sota, of which 5 are R-2 and 16 are t~1. OEfiaial A~se stated that the app]ican'c had been before t~~e P1annL'~g Cu~nlesion esrller, ~"~,on Januazy 25, 1978, w111~ a rc~queat £or 23 lote, of which fiva required rezoning, ,~ f and which the W~anieaicut t~Sl~ until th~ a~pl.ic~nk worcked out eane of the prableos, and again on Fk~,vary B, 1978, with a redrawn plat with a looped roacl rrysten and 22 lots, which the Planni~ Camzieelon denied ~t that time. Offlcial T~ee stated that in additim to the plannirg consideratims cavera3 earlier when the donmtesion had revies~ed the requpeta, the applicant is requesting rezaaLx,~ of the five undeveloped lots fmnting 0.unty laoad I, and thist all lote meet ax~ea a~x3 square footage rc~~izt~miits with th4 exception of Lat 3 and 7nt 12, eloclc 1, who~ widths in the allowable ]wildable area are rot 85' and 100' respectively. F!e added that the applicant miat aMw the future s~~t~division line &rr Ivt 6, Dlock 1 as it cen be aubdivi.decl furttnr with the cul-de-eac extensl~ into thA ProprstY W tha ~rth, Official I3~se re~oL~ted that the sprlicant~s p2at sh~ws a looped cul-fie-eac with a di.vldec7 meens of aaoess. mhf ~ daubie driye aooesg v.wld cat ef£ectively prwide ku,o acoesses iror emer9~~Y P~'Ewses and that a greater se~zation vxwld be ne~.bseary. He added that it would also present eafety pr~blems. as both entrancea oouid at scire time be blocked. He also stated that the dwble drive aa.ess t~ould be haxd tn maintain wlrn smw plowiny and that any landsc~p;ng on the rbuble drive aeparatiai ielarrl wou]rl have tn be maintained, which v.ould be i~ractia~l srul would bi.=oai~e a nuieance £nr tl~ City Go maintain. Officlal Pc;se statad that a dovble drive acceas waild Iz.~orn~e an addit3one7. Fblioe probl?m t~ trafilc arui iiuioa..:Q .:~~aa :r.d tl:e r+_ty w,Zi~; ~'ire. ES:gineering attd Plannixq azparlments ooncvr w~ the probiem~. Offir.ial Ii~se aleo zeportsd hhat tha prqx~sed mtui ease+t~s~t to the pmperty to the ~ north ie 50' and dua to the length of the pmpoeed cul-de-eac and the servicea needed, 50' twuld be w:.ficient aid a varianck hvuld be tequireG.