1978-04-12 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~4 ~ ';: ! PROCEEDINfiS OF THE PLANNING CONwMISSION CITY OF MOUN6S VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA A regutar meeting of the Mounds View Ptenning Comnlssion was celled to order et 7:30 PM on Apr11 12, 1978 at the Maunds View City Ilei1, 2401 Highwey 30, Mounds V1ew, Minneso4e 66112. Memhers PresenC: Cheirperson Haake ~omnission Mem6er Mackeben Comnission Member Fedor Commis~ion Memtier Burmelster Comnission Member 8lanchard Comnission Member Foss Also Present; Councilmember Baumgartner Building and Zuning Officlal Rose Members Absent; Commission Member Glezer Official Rose reported that Comm7ssion Member Glazer had culled him end would be absont due to p personal prablem, but did hope to 9oin the meeting later. Comnission Member Durmeister asked that the minutes of the Merch 22, 1978 meeting be corrected in the motion at the buttom af page 2 to reploce the cortma between dr1v~ and although with a period and stert a new sentence with although. She elso requested ~~''~~that the matlons on pego s ne corrected te have a comna rether than a perlod efter ~Lhe ;:~rd factrrs end continuo the santanae an. MSP {Burmeister-Blenchard) to approve the minutes of the March 22, 1978 meeting as corrected. b ayes BUILDING ADOITION REQUEST OF CHARLES HALL - 2200 HIGHWAY 10 Official Rose reported thet pursuant 1:o Chapter 59, Section 7, Devetopment Controls, tha Planning f,omnissir~n and City Council must review and approve the request of Charles Hall to construct an addltlon of a 24 lane bowllng a11ey to Ms existing bar and dining faeilltias. Th~ Planning Coimiission and City Council revleN~d plans similar to the current submissinn during the spring of 1976 and approved the appli- cetlan but due to financing, the praJect d9d not occur and the City wlthdrew its approval. Off1c1e1 Rose reported that plenning cnnsideratlons include that the area 1s xoned General Business and Shopping Centers end the use is a B-4 Reqlona1 Business type. 7he Comprehensive P1an denotes a highway comnerciet usage. The new addition is 20,640 square feet, compared to 20,1E0 square feet requested in 1976. OfPiciel Rose explained that the chnnge is represented by an addltional corridcr for the southri6iY anti•siicn a~~d avn a oreakdawn aF ti~a srea~ and tho differsnca in the squere footage requested versus C~at of 1975, and sumnarlxed eaying thet the current ptan Par constructinn is very simllar to the epproved 1975 plan, with the only iifference betng the addition o4 total square footage evolv9ng from the chenge 1n .~entrences.