Laserfiche WebLink
Apri1 12, 1978 <br />Page 6 <br />hairperson Haake questioned iP there could be a walkway between Spring Lake Road and <br />teasant View Por the children to use in getting to the park and schoois. Officiel <br />Rose replled that it had b2en discussed at one time and the property owners were <br />vehemently c!pposed to it. He added that the easemenC was in existonce then and the <br />people did not want the walkway. Conmission Member foss pointed out that some of <br />the people who had been opposed to the v;alkway hnd since moved from the area. <br />Mr. Thornton scatad that he would have no ob~ection to putting in a walkway as long as <br />he did not have to mainta9n it. <br />Russ Christianson, 8200 Spring Lake Foad stated that Mr. Thornton hed spoken to the <br />residents of the area about his pians and that they were supportive of the rezaning <br />for obvious reasuns but that they did have some reservations about the size of some <br />of the lots, Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 and Lots 3 and 4, Black 1 in particular. He asked <br />that the Pianning Comnisston do everything pos,lbie to make the area as pleasant as <br />possible. <br />Chairperson Haake pointed out that lot 8 did meet cade. Official Rose addrd thut. h~ felt <br />Chere Nou1d not be'a building problem with the 1ots, and that var9ances !vere required <br />because they did nat meet the letter of t.he iaw,so to say. He further added that he <br />had conferred with Attorney Meyers, who agreed with his interpret;ation. <br />Gary Cheznick, 8160 Spring Lake Road questioned where the pro osed water line from <br />Spring Lake Road woutd go, Officlal Rose replied that it wouRd be approxfmately <br />10' from the property 11ne. <br />~~~~r. Cheznick stated that he was concE•rned with the trees that would be teken down. Ne <br />~-^'po{nted out that therA were six oak trees, 75-100' ta11 rhat wcu7d hnve to be taken <br />ouC if the water line was put in. Mr. Murphy rep'lied that the water line could come <br />9n off Pleasant View Drive whfch wou7d be more expensive but that they wou~d be willing <br />to do 1t in order to save the trees. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner asked where Che runoff fram the stonn sewer would go. Mr <br />Murphy replted that it coutd drain to both the north and south to catch basins. <br />Caunr.i7member Baumgartner asked if Pleasant View CourC couid exit d9rect7y onto Highway <br />10 and thus avoid having such a long cul-de-sac. Mr. Murphy repifed that from past <br />experience, he diJ not fee7 the Highway Cepartment would allow it. Chafrperson Haake <br />edded that she felt it would be more desirabie to have a cui-de-sac. <br />Comnission Membe~ Mackeben pointad out that the cui-de-sa^. would be a very long one. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner added that the Planning Co~nission had spent three meetings <br />with the Efyenheer development trying to get rid of his tong cul-de-sar, and had finally <br />pequired a looped road. He asked if the Fire Department had comnented on the cul-de-•sac. <br />Offlcial Rose repiied that they had and that they did not feel it wou7d be a problem. <br />He also explained that the Eigenheer development had been a different situation since <br />he had had the opportunlty to )oop the system because of the sixe, whereas with the <br />Thornton development, it would be m~re detrimental and likety impossibte tp hook up <br />to Highway i0. Official Rose added that he~felt the cu1-de-sac could be shortened, <br />which viould be better than connecting with Hlghway 10. <br />, "omnission Member Foss asked if there wculd be any probiem with the City mainLatning <br />~~+ waikway. Official Rose reulied that he was not sure if 10' woutd be wide enuugh, <br />since it would have to be wide enough for a snow plow. He pointed out, though, that <br />if it was much wider than 10', there couid be a problem with cars trying to drive down <br />it. <br />