Laserfiche WebLink
Apr11 12, 19J8 <br />Paga 8 <br />Comnisslo~ Member Mackeben sceted thet he was c~nfused with the easement Por the wetk- <br />~xplained chatWtheyhwoutd~berdedlcetinggit because 1fNthey justigrantedpthereas mel~tter <br />tho peopie wouid still own ft, Official Rose edded that the City had no present right <br />to put a walkway over the easement unless an easement were granted for it. <br />Comnission MembE~r Mackeben questioned if it would be more edvantageous on Lot 13 to <br />~ try and group the homes in tine rather than allowing the home to be built beck. <br />Offlctal Rose rept',ed that the home could not 6e bu11t on the easement and thet they <br />must sti11 maintain a 3~' setback from the rear tot 11ne, and that the developer <br />~ hopefully would come up with a house style that would compliment the tat. <br />f Councilmember Baumgartner pointed out that with a 35' dedication, Lots 12 and 13 woutd <br />change in size. Chairpersor Haake reptied that ¢hey would st111 meet code requirements~ <br />~ Counciln~mber 6aumgertnnr stated thet it must ba made known Lo the people who buy Lots <br />~ YL and Y3 that the dadication is there. Official Rose replied thet it would become pnrt <br />, of the piat. <br />M5P (MeckeEen-Foss) to amend the prevlous motlon to delete the variance request on <br />lot 13 to bu11d a home deepar than the normal setback requirement. 6 ayes <br />S absta{n <br />Comnission Member Glazer abstained on the vote. <br />t9r. Thornkon stated that he would 11ke the Councll to give him credit un the Park fund <br />for the dedication. Chairperson Haake repited that the Park Qoard would consider it. <br />r~, <br />~„~Ccmmisiian Member Mackeben left the meeting at tM s time. <br />MAJOR SUBDIYISION REQUEST OF KEN SJODIN - 8100 GROVELFND ROAD <br />- ..__....-- - . _ <br />Official Rose rep~rted that Mr. S~odin was requesting to change hfs n~a,lor subd9vision <br />request to a minor subdivision and drew a sketch of what he was requesting. Offleial <br />Rose axpiained that Mr. SJodin was trying ta obtairt a buildabte ]ot fronting Groveland <br />Road. He explained thc~ the City has, in the past, reviewed and had a feasibility study <br />prepared for the extension af Kno7lwoad sout.h of Ardan Avenue. At that t1me, it seemed <br />more feasible to connect in a westerly direction to Spring Lake Road. Since that time, <br />the home io~ated at QTOQ Grovetand has been demolished, thus allowing the Knollwaod <br />extenslon to connect to Grovelond Road and Sherwood Road. Atthough the proposed street <br />easement and the existing Sherwood Road easement are not directly in line with each <br />other, Sta.'f feels that an offsetting of the new street on its easement can compensate <br />for the non-alignment. Official Rose explained that Mr. S,~odin is also interested in <br />possible fu11 development af the property. In the,event that Knotiwood was extended <br />south, he could grant easements and create buitdable 1ots. Officlal Rose added that <br />the City 1s intepested in getting easements for the Knoilwood extension, and could deed <br />one buildabl~ lot, which would become voided once the r~hoie plat becomes final. <br />A1r. SJod7n expleined that he did not know Por s~re if the sxreet v~as gaing to 90 1n <br />and that he had purchased the property with an ald house on it end had demoiished <br />the Irouse wfth the idea of sp7ltting the lnt. However, the City now would prefer <br />to put the roed through since the house had been demoiished. He explatned that he <br />~ would like ane minor subdivision at this time so he cou7d build one home. He edded <br />,~,.that ell the nssessments were in and paid on Graveland. He also added that he would <br />sign a petikion for puttin~; Knollwood in and that• if the City did take a b0' easement, <br />he wouid heve to dedicate the other lTy' to the other property owner. He added thet <br />he would cocperate with the City in anY WB~, end painted out tf~at there were n iot oP <br />